public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	hskinnemoen@atmel.com, cooloney@kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org,
	dhowells@redhat.com, matthew@wil.cx, chris@zankel.net,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull -tip] headers_check fixes for other architectures
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:48:42 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1233929922.3209.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090206022025.GA8317@elte.hu>

On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 03:20 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 20:19 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > > Jaswinder, because they can break the build we should proactively drop all 
> > > architecture patches that do asm/types.h conversions.
> > > 
> > > I did build all the affected architectures via their defconfigs and they 
> > > built just fine - but i cannot do wide coverage testing of them.
> > > 
> > > So i think we should drop these bits:
> > > 
> > >  earth4:~/tip> gll --grep='asm/types.h' linus..core/header-fixes
> > >  1ff8f73: headers_check fix: xtensa, swab.h
> > >  4810987: headers_check fix: powerpc, swab.h
> > >  9f2cd96: headers_check fix: powerpc, kvm.h
> > >  785857f: headers_check fix: powerpc, elf.h
> > >  4be2c7f: headers_check fix: powerpc, bootx.h
> > >  726da1e: headers_check fix: parisc, swab.h
> > >  bef53ca: headers_check fix: mn10300, swab.h
> > >  a9f6acc: headers_check fix: mips, swab.h
> > >  d8cbec1: headers_check fix: m32r, swab.h
> > >  040c92b: headers_check fix: ia64, swab.h
> > >  6ce7950: headers_check fix: ia64, kvm.h
> > >  fa9ea6c: headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
> > >  295803e: headers_check fix: h8300, swab.h
> > >  dacd762: headers_check fix: frv, swab.h
> > >  350eb8b: headers_check fix: blackfin, swab.h
> > >  1c6ce70: headers_check fix: avr32, swab.h
> > >  e42ec24: headers_check fix: arm, swab.h
> > >  4af3bf6: headers_check fix: arm, setup.h
> > >  f100e6d: headers_check fix: arm, a.out.h
> > >  3fd5906: headers_check fix: alpha, swab.h
> > > 
> > > and send the rest to Linus if all outstanding observations have been 
> > > addressed. What do you think?
> > > 
> > 
> > The problem is if we include linux/types.h in assembly file we will get
> > error.
> > 
> > We can solve this problem by four options (or may be more):
> > 1. by wrapping #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ files which are used by assembly
> > code as suggested by Tony.
> > 
> > 2. fix linux/types.h so that assembly file can also use it
> > 
> > 3. drop patches which are used by assembly files
> > 
> > 4. drop all architecture patches as you suggested.
> 
> hm, the highest quality approach seems to be #2, right?
> 

Is this safe OR we can make it more safer:

Subject: [PATCH] make linux/types.h as assembly safe

Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/types.h |    3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/types.h b/include/linux/types.h
index 712ca53..c30973a 100644
--- a/include/linux/types.h
+++ b/include/linux/types.h
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 #ifndef _LINUX_TYPES_H
 #define _LINUX_TYPES_H
 
+#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
 #ifdef	__KERNEL__
 
 #define DECLARE_BITMAP(name,bits) \
@@ -212,5 +213,5 @@ struct ustat {
 };
 
 #endif	/* __KERNEL__ */
-
+#endif /*  __ASSEMBLY__ */
 #endif /* _LINUX_TYPES_H */
-- 
1.6.0.6




  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-06 14:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-31  7:10 [git pull -tip] headers_check fixes for other architectures Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-01-31 16:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-01  6:30   ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-01 10:39     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-01 16:49       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-01 17:06         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-01 17:20         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-01 17:31           ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-01 18:33         ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-02 17:11         ` Mike Frysinger
2009-02-02 18:08           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-02 18:29             ` Mike Frysinger
2009-02-02 18:48               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-05 17:55 ` Tony Luck
2009-02-05 19:06   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-05 19:19     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06  2:06       ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06  2:14         ` Mike Frysinger
2009-02-06  2:20         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 14:18           ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput [this message]
2009-02-06 14:21             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 14:34               ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 14:51                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 14:58                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 15:00                   ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 15:10                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 15:56                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:02                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 17:24             ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-06 17:40               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 18:11               ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 18:42                 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-06 19:31                   ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-08  5:50               ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-09 12:23                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06  8:19 ` [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-06  8:53   ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06  9:11     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-06 14:55       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 15:29         ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 15:33           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 15:45             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 15:49               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 16:01                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 15:48             ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 15:55               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 16:12                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:23                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 16:33                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:38                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 17:14                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 17:22                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 17:32                 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-06 17:41                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 18:53     ` Luck, Tony
2009-02-06 13:42   ` Sam Ravnborg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1233929922.3209.6.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=jaswinder@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris@zankel.net \
    --cc=cooloney@kernel.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hskinnemoen@atmel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox