From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755309AbZBIOrU (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:47:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752625AbZBIOrK (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:47:10 -0500 Received: from rcsinet11.oracle.com ([148.87.113.123]:38988 "EHLO rgminet11.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752202AbZBIOrK (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:47:10 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.6.29-rc4: possible circular locking dependency at btrfs_try_spin_lock From: Chris Mason To: Alexander Beregalov Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, LKML In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 09:47:00 -0500 Message-Id: <1234190820.1262.0.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: acsmt705.oracle.com [141.146.40.83] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090205.499041E8.00A0:SCFSTAT928724,ss=1,fgs=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 15:43 +0300, Alexander Beregalov wrote: > Hi > Is it false positive lockdep warning? > Interesting, lockdep must be smarter in linux-next. It's a false positive, I'll try to fix it up. -chris