From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754749AbZBJRGX (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:06:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753634AbZBJRGL (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:06:11 -0500 Received: from e39.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.160]:53453 "EHLO e39.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753267AbZBJRGJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:06:09 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC v13][PATCH 00/14] Kernel based checkpoint/restart From: Dave Hansen To: Oren Laadan Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Linus Torvalds , Alexander Viro , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar In-Reply-To: <1233076092-8660-1-git-send-email-orenl@cs.columbia.edu> References: <1233076092-8660-1-git-send-email-orenl@cs.columbia.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:05:47 -0800 Message-Id: <1234285547.30155.6.camel@nimitz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 12:07 -0500, Oren Laadan wrote: > Checkpoint-restart (c/r): a couple of fixes in preparation for 64bit > architectures, and a couple of fixes for bugss (comments from Serge > Hallyn, Sudakvev Bhattiprolu and Nathan Lynch). Updated and tested > against v2.6.28. > > Aiming for -mm. Is there anything that we're waiting on before these can go into -mm? I think the discussion on the first few patches has died down to almost nothing. They're pretty reviewed-out. Do they need a run in -mm? I don't think linux-next is quite appropriate since they're not _quite_ aimed at mainline yet. -- Dave