From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752134AbZBNJJy (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Feb 2009 04:09:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750976AbZBNJJk (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Feb 2009 04:09:40 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:40437 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750931AbZBNJJk (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Feb 2009 04:09:40 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5]: drm: ati_pcigart: Do not access I/O MEM space using pointer derefs. From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Dave Airlie Cc: David Miller , airlied@linux.ie, dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <21d7e9970902132342k1a756475t91ede4baf571c563@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090212.021527.12463602.davem@davemloft.net> <1234434959.29851.55.camel@pasglop> <20090213.220934.236067646.davem@davemloft.net> <21d7e9970902132342k1a756475t91ede4baf571c563@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 20:09:24 +1100 Message-Id: <1234602564.26036.84.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > The only think I can think to do is use a surface instead of the > aperture swappers > and make the surface cover all the VRAM except the GART table which is > at the end. Why not use a surface to cover the GART ? At least this would ensure a known swapper setting for it. > That's interesting, it could explain why things never work again after a reset > or at least proceed to hang straight away. No shit :-) Cheers, Ben.