From: "Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Cyrill Gorcunov" <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] x86 tip asm ENTRY,ENDPROC cleanup
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 12:42:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1234611775.19975.1300340003@webmail.messagingengine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49961178.6040101@zytor.com>
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:34:00 -0800, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
said:
> Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
> >
> > Hi Cyrill,
> >
> > I like this direction. If I understand correctly:
> >
> > ENTRY/END or GLOBAL/END for data.
> > ENTRY/ENDPROC or GLOBAL/ENDPROC for functions.
> >
>
> Fine for functions, but it's really not okay to use the same macros for
> data. Furthermore, we need to consider special entry points that don't
> behave like normal functions -- like system call or interrupt entry.
>
> Why? Because if we're compiling with frame pointers, we would like the
> wrapper macros for functions to handle setting up and tearing down the
> frame pointer, at least in the common case.
Hi Peter,
I see. But that would be new behaviour. I would propose to use
completely separate macro's to handle frame-setup code generation,
and keep ENTRY/GLOBAL/END/ENDPROC only for setting metadata and
alignment. I think it's worth it to spell out code-generating
macro's explicitly: there are not that many asm functions, and
quite a few of them would need special handling. I think noone
wants to see an ENDPROC_NOFRAMETEARDOWN ;).
The common-case example would look like this.
GLOBAL(c_callable_function)
ENTER
[asm-code]
LEAVE
ret
ENDPROC(c_callable_function)
Greetings,
Alexander
> -hpa
--
Alexander van Heukelum
heukelum@fastmail.fm
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - I mean, what is it about a decent email service?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-14 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-13 21:50 [RFC 0/6] x86 tip asm ENTRY,ENDPROC cleanup Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-02-13 21:50 ` [RFC 1/6] x86: asm linkage - introduce GLOBAL macro Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-02-13 21:50 ` [RFC 2/6] x86: linkage - get rid of _X86 macros Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-02-13 21:50 ` [RFC 3/6] x86: copy.S - use GLOBAL,ENDPROC macros Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-02-13 21:50 ` [RFC 4/6] x86: pmjump " Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-02-13 21:50 ` [RFC 5/6] x86: compressed head_64 - use ENTRY,ENDPROC macros Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-02-13 21:50 ` [RFC 6/6] x86: compressed head_32 " Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-02-13 23:23 ` [RFC 0/6] x86 tip asm ENTRY,ENDPROC cleanup Alexander van Heukelum
2009-02-14 0:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-14 8:21 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-02-14 11:42 ` Alexander van Heukelum [this message]
2009-02-14 20:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-19 16:13 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1234611775.19975.1300340003@webmail.messagingengine.com \
--to=heukelum@fastmail.fm \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox