From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Edward Shishkin <edward.shishkin@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Ryan Hope <rmh3093@gmail.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ReiserFS Mailing List <reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] vfs: add set_page_dirty_notag
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:09:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1234861781.4744.21.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18841.60432.329341.514726@edward.zelnet.ru>
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 01:43 +0300, Edward Shishkin wrote:
> > How much performance gain do you see by avoiding that radix tree op?
> >
>
> Nop. We want to use it with extended semantics.
> All dirty pages are divided into 2 categories:
>
> A) tagged in the radix tree (with PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY).
> B) captured by atoms (usual linked lists).
>
> reiser4_writepages() looks for pages of "A" in the radix tree
> and moves them to "B". set_page_dirty_notag(), introduced by
> my patch, is needed for pages of "B".
>
> If "B" is empty, then we get the traditional semantics with
> regular ->writepages().
>
> That's all!
Ah, indeed. I had not considered such a scheme.
> Add set_page_dirty_notag() to the core library to enable
> extended functionality of radix tree attached to inode->i_mapping.
>
> Signed-off-by: Edward Shishkin<edward.shishkin@gmail.com>
Looks good to me
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 1 +
> mm/page-writeback.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>
> --- mmotm.orig/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ mmotm/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -841,6 +841,7 @@ int redirty_page_for_writepage(struct wr
> struct page *page);
> int set_page_dirty(struct page *page);
> int set_page_dirty_lock(struct page *page);
> +int set_page_dirty_notag(struct page *page);
> int clear_page_dirty_for_io(struct page *page);
>
> extern unsigned long move_page_tables(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> --- mmotm.orig/mm/page-writeback.c
> +++ mmotm/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -1248,6 +1248,42 @@ int __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(struct pa
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__set_page_dirty_nobuffers);
>
> /*
> + * set_page_dirty_notag() -- similar to __set_page_dirty_nobuffers()
> + * except it doesn't tag the page dirty in the page-cache radix tree.
> + * This means that the address space using this cannot use the regular
> + * filemap ->writepages() helpers and must provide its own means of
> + * tracking and finding non-tagged dirty pages.
> + *
> + * NOTE: furthermore, this version also doesn't handle truncate races.
> + */
> +int set_page_dirty_notag(struct page *page)
> +{
> + struct address_space *mapping = page->mapping;
> +
> + if (!TestSetPageDirty(page)) {
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!PagePrivate(page) && !PageUptodate(page));
> + if (mapping_cap_account_dirty(mapping)) {
> + /*
> + * The accounting functions rely on
> + * being atomic wrt interrupts.
> + */
> + unsigned long flags;
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> + __inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_FILE_DIRTY);
> + __inc_bdi_stat(mapping->backing_dev_info,
> + BDI_RECLAIMABLE);
> + task_dirty_inc(current);
> + task_io_account_write(PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> + }
> + __mark_inode_dirty(mapping->host, I_DIRTY_PAGES);
> + return 1;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_page_dirty_notag);
> +
> +/*
> * When a writepage implementation decides that it doesn't want to write this
> * page for some reason, it should redirty the locked page via
> * redirty_page_for_writepage() and it should then unlock the page and return 0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-17 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-13 11:56 [patch 2/4] vfs: add set_page_dirty_notag Edward Shishkin
2009-02-13 13:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-13 13:57 ` Edward Shishkin
2009-02-13 14:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-14 13:11 ` Edward Shishkin
2009-02-14 21:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-16 22:43 ` Edward Shishkin
2009-02-17 9:09 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-02-17 9:38 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-17 10:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 10:24 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-17 10:40 ` set_page_dirty races (was: Re: [patch 2/4] vfs: add set_page_dirty_notag) Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 11:25 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-17 11:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 11:55 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-17 12:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-17 12:30 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-17 22:35 ` [patch 2/4] vfs: add set_page_dirty_notag Andrew Morton
2009-02-18 0:26 ` Edward Shishkin
2009-02-18 0:38 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-18 13:27 ` [patch 1/2] vfs: add/use update_page_accounting Edward Shishkin
2009-02-18 14:06 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-18 18:23 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-18 13:27 ` [patch 2/2] vfs: (take 2)add set_page_dirty_notag Edward Shishkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1234861781.4744.21.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=edward.shishkin@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmh3093@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox