From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1755236AbZBQXFo@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755236AbZBQXFo (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:05:44 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754749AbZBQXFa
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:05:30 -0500
Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:58234 "EHLO mga01.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754721AbZBQXF3 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:05:29 -0500
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,225,1233561600"; 
   d="asc'?scan'208";a="431771443"
Subject: Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since
	2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
From: Eric Anholt <eric.anholt@intel.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>,
       Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
       Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213@schottelius.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090215134347.GB21670@srcf.ucam.org>
References: <juADNmcceYF.A.mdD.Mr0lJB@chimera>
	 <rjPbZ5GRJPO.A.htD.Sr0lJB@chimera>  <20090215134347.GB21670@srcf.ucam.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ZYRDkFtZKrrDGwk61+4W"
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:05:25 -0800
Message-Id: <1234911925.9844.89.camel@gaiman>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


--=-ZYRDkFtZKrrDGwk61+4W
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 13:43 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 09:38:23PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>=20
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me kno=
w
> > (either way).
>=20
> I think Eric sent a test patch for this. Did that get pushed?

I haven't done anything in the area of brightness control.

--=20
Eric Anholt
eric@anholt.net                         eric.anholt@intel.com



--=-ZYRDkFtZKrrDGwk61+4W
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkmbQrUACgkQHUdvYGzw6vfToQCgke6csFpyf3QtChdAfNXpqrAb
RYEAni5ioUMT2PYh1zeKZHth7xCHpcVf
=JTxd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-ZYRDkFtZKrrDGwk61+4W--