From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753242AbZBRJqt (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:46:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752046AbZBRJql (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:46:41 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:37151 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752044AbZBRJqk (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:46:40 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] generic-ipi: simplify the barriers From: Peter Zijlstra To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Linus Torvalds , Nick Piggin , Jens Axboe , Ingo Molnar , Rusty Russell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov In-Reply-To: <20090218002702.GA25256@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20090217215904.059250145@chello.nl> <20090217220053.410275566@chello.nl> <20090218002702.GA25256@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:45:58 +0100 Message-Id: <1234950358.4637.0.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.25.90 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 16:27 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > While I sympathize with pushing memory barriers down into the > arch-specific functions, you -are- running this by the various > arch maintainers so that they have an opportunity to adjust, right? Nick's initial posting of this patch included linux-arch -- maybe I should have added that too.