From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ACPI hotplug panic with current git head
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:08:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1234984088.3225.44.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200902181059.26779.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 10:59 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Monday, February 16, 2009 9:10 pm Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
> > Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, January 28, 2009 3:47 am Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
> > >> I made several patches to fix the wrong assumption described
> > >> above. It is very difficult for me to check all the code that
> > >> refers pci_bus->self. So I checked include/linux/pci-acpi.h and
> > >> the code under drivers/pci/ only. And I made patches for the code
> > >> like below:
> > >>
> > >> - The code that clearly chooses host bridge operation or
> > >> PCI-to-PCI bridge operation based on pci_bus->self.
> > >>
> > >> - The code that might cause endless loop if pci_bus->self is
> > >> not NULL on the PCI root bus.
> > >
> > > Kenji-san, can you re-send these to my private mail so I can apply them?
> > > (Outlook/Exchange can't let plain text through without molesting it for
> > > some reason.)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> >
> > Sure. Resending the following patches. I made those patches against
> > 2.6.29-rc2. I've confirmed they can be applied to 2.6.29-rc5.
> >
> > - [PATCH 1/8] PCI/ACPI: fix wrong assumption in acpi_pci_get_bridge_handle
> > - [PATCH 2/8] PCI/ACPI: fix wrong assumption in
> > acpi_find_root_bridge_handle - [PATCH 3/8] PCI hotplug: fix wrong
> > assumption in acpi_get_hp_params_from_firmware - [PATCH 4/8] PCI hotplug:
> > fix wrong assumption in acpi_get_hp_hw_control_from_firmware - [PATCH 5/8]
> > PCI: fix wrong assumption in pci_find_upstream_pcie_bridge - [PATCH 6/8]
> > PCI: fix wrong assumption in pci_read_bridge_bases
> > - [PATCH 7/8] PCI: fix wrong assumption in pci_get_interrupt_pin
> > - [PATCH 8/8] PCI: fix wrong assumption in pci_common_swizzle
>
> James have you tested this set? I didn't see your tested-by in the
> changelogs... Just want to make sure if I'm going to send these to Linus for
> 2.6.29.
Um ... no. I have enough trouble picking up my own patches from email.
Is there a git tree of this? I can pull that in to the box in question
if so.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-18 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-10 16:17 ACPI hotplug panic with current git head James Bottomley
2009-01-12 21:16 ` Len Brown
2009-01-13 0:48 ` James Bottomley
2009-01-13 3:40 ` Len Brown
2009-01-15 19:01 ` James Bottomley
2009-01-15 19:22 ` Len Brown
2009-01-15 19:54 ` James Bottomley
2009-01-15 20:12 ` James Bottomley
2009-01-16 6:07 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-16 14:19 ` James Bottomley
2009-01-19 1:10 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-19 1:23 ` James Bottomley
2009-01-19 3:11 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-21 17:26 ` James Bottomley
2009-01-26 2:11 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-26 6:21 ` Grant Grundler
2009-01-26 12:27 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-28 11:47 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-28 11:48 ` [PATCH 1/8] PCI/ACPI: fix wrong assumption in acpi_pci_get_bridge_handle Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-28 11:50 ` [PATCH 2/8] PCI/ACPI: fix wrong assumption in acpi_find_root_bridge_handle Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-28 11:51 ` [PATCH 3/8] PCI hotplug: fix wrong assumption in acpi_get_hp_params_from_firmware Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-28 11:55 ` [PATCH 4/8] PCI hotplug: fix wrong assumption in acpi_get_hp_hw_control_from_firmware Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-28 11:56 ` [PATCH 5/8] PCI: fix wrong assumption in pci_find_upstream_pcie_bridge Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-28 11:57 ` [PATCH 6/8] PCI: fix wrong assumption in pci_read_bridge_bases Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-28 11:58 ` [PATCH 7/8] PCI: fix wrong assumption in pci_get_interrupt_pin Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-28 11:59 ` [PATCH 8/8] PCI: fix wrong assumption in pci_common_swizzle Kenji Kaneshige
2009-01-28 12:05 ` ACPI hotplug panic with current git head Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-14 0:30 ` Jesse Barnes
[not found] ` <499A46CC.1020102@jp.fujitsu.com>
2009-02-18 18:59 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-02-18 19:08 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2009-02-18 19:41 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-03-02 17:07 ` James Bottomley
2009-01-16 20:08 ` Len Brown
2009-01-16 20:22 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-01-19 1:15 ` Kenji Kaneshige
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1234984088.3225.44.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox