From: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
jan sonnek <ha2nny@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Subject: Re: Regression - locking (all from 2.6.28)
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 08:52:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1236358369.10626.58.camel@nimitz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1236357616.3882.66.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com>
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 16:40 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> It seems that node_start_pfn() isn't present on all the architectures. I
> ended up with something like below:
>
> + /* struct page scanning for each node */
> + for_each_online_node(i) {
> + pg_data_t *pgdat = NODE_DATA(i);
> + unsigned long start_pfn = pgdat->node_start_pfn;
> + unsigned long end_pfn = start_pfn +
> + pgdat->node_spanned_pages - 1;
> + unsigned long pfn;
> +
> + for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++) {
> + struct page *page;
> +
> + if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
> + continue;
> + page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
> + /* only scan if page is in use */
> + if (page_count(page) == 0)
> + continue;
> + scan_block(page, page + 1, NULL);
> + }
> + }
What does scan_block() actually scan? Is that second argument
inclusive?
I think you will miss scanning the contents of the last 'struct page' if
you do it this way because of the -1 you do to end_pfn.
> Are the pgdat->node_start_pfn and pgdat->node_spanned_pages always
> valid? Thanks.
The variables themselves? I'm sure there's a window in early boot where
they aren't valid, but other than that they should be OK unless you're
int the middle of a hotplug operation.
See pgdat_resize_(un)lock() in include/linux/memory_hotplug.h.
-- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-06 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <49AC334A.9030800@gmail.com>
2009-03-02 20:11 ` Regression - locking (all from 2.6.28) Andrew Morton
2009-03-03 10:41 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-03-03 15:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-03-05 0:54 ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-05 18:04 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-03-05 18:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-06 16:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-03-06 16:52 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2009-03-06 17:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-03-06 17:26 ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-06 18:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-03-06 19:19 ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-06 19:28 ` Pavel Machek
2009-03-16 22:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-03-17 0:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-14 16:24 ` Pavel Machek
2009-03-16 17:12 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-03-03 18:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-22 4:45 jan sonnek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1236358369.10626.58.camel@nimitz \
--to=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=ha2nny@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox