From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch -mm] cpusets: add memory_slab_hardwall flag
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 12:01:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1236531664.4192.389.camel@calx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903080917460.25207@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 09:27 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> Adds a per-cpuset `memory_slab_hardwall' flag.
>
> The slab allocator interface for determining whether an object is allowed
> is
>
> int current_cpuset_object_allowed(int node, gfp_t flags)
>
> This returns non-zero when the object is allowed, either because
> current's cpuset does not have memory_slab_hardwall enabled or because
> it allows allocation on the node. Otherwise, it returns zero.
>
> This interface is lockless because a task's cpuset can always be safely
> dereferenced atomically.
>
> For slab, if the physical node id of the cpu cache is not from an
> allowable node, the allocation will fail. If an allocation is targeted
> for a node that is not allowed, we allocate from an appropriate one
> instead of failing.
>
> For slob, if the page from the slob list is not from an allowable node,
> we continue to scan for an appropriate slab. If none can be used, a new
> slab is allocated.
Looks fine to me, if a little expensive. We'll be needing SLQB support
though.
--
http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-08 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-08 16:27 [patch -mm] cpusets: add memory_slab_hardwall flag David Rientjes
2009-03-08 16:53 ` Paul Menage
2009-03-08 21:38 ` David Rientjes
2009-03-09 7:08 ` Paul Menage
2009-03-09 9:18 ` David Rientjes
2009-03-08 17:01 ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2009-03-08 21:51 ` David Rientjes
2009-03-09 4:49 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-09 9:12 ` David Rientjes
2009-03-09 10:19 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-09 20:26 ` David Rientjes
2009-03-09 21:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-03-09 21:31 ` David Rientjes
2009-03-10 20:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-03-10 21:08 ` Matt Mackall
2009-03-12 16:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-03-12 17:23 ` Matt Mackall
2009-03-10 22:12 ` Paul Menage
2009-03-12 15:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-03-09 18:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-03-09 20:13 ` David Rientjes
2009-03-10 1:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-10 2:01 ` David Rientjes
2009-03-10 4:05 ` Matt Mackall
2009-03-10 4:26 ` David Rientjes
2009-03-12 1:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-12 5:51 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1236531664.4192.389.camel@calx \
--to=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox