From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Balazs Scheidler <bazsi@balabit.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Subject: Re: [patch] Re: scheduler oddity [bug?]
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 15:11:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1236607890.6168.7.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1236607083.5980.8.camel@marge.simson.net>
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 14:58 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 14:46 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 14:37 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 14:16 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 12:04 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > OK, talked a bit with Ingo, the reason you're doing is that avg_overlap
> > > > > can easily grow stale.. I can see that happen indeed.
> > > > >
> > > > > So the 'perfect' thing would be a task-runtime decay, barring that the
> > > > > preemption thing seems a sane enough hart-beat of a task.
> > > > >
> > > > > How does the below look to you?
> > > >
> > > > Other than the fact that the test for sync reject is currently
> > > > avg_overlap > sysctl_sched_migration_cost, looks fine to me. Having it
> > > > capped at the boundary is probably the better way to go.
> > >
> > > Heh, doesn't _quite_ work though. The little bugger now hovers just
> > > under :-/
> >
> > > se.avg_overlap : 0.499993
> >
> > Right, update_avg()'s >>3 and the off-by-one you spotted.
>
> (that was with the off-by-one fixed, but..)
>
> > I recon stuff works better with a 2* added? After that I guess its
> > praying sysbench still works.. :-)
>
> Yes 2* worked fine. Mysql+oltp was my worry spot, being a very affinity
> sensitive little <bleep>, but my patchlet didn't cause any trouble, so
> this one shouldn't either. I'll do some re-test in any case, and squeak
> should anything turn up.
Squeak! Didn't even get to mysql+oltp.
marge:..local/tmp # netperf -t UDP_STREAM -l 60 -H 127.0.0.1 -- -P 15888,12384 -s 32768 -S 32768 -m 4096
UDP UNIDIRECTIONAL SEND TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 15888 AF_INET to 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) port 12384 AF_INET
Socket Message Elapsed Messages
Size Size Time Okay Errors Throughput
bytes bytes secs # # 10^6bits/sec
65536 4096 60.00 5161103 0 2818.65
65536 60.00 5149666 2812.40
6188 root 20 0 1040 544 324 R 100 0.0 0:31.49 0 netperf
6189 root 20 0 1044 260 164 R 48 0.0 0:15.35 3 netserver
Hurt, pain, ouch, vs...
marge:..local/tmp # netperf -t UDP_STREAM -l 60 -H 127.0.0.1 -T 0,0 -- -P 15888,12384 -s 32768 -S 32768 -m 4096
UDP UNIDIRECTIONAL SEND TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 15888 AF_INET to 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) port 12384 AF_INET : cpu bind
Socket Message Elapsed Messages
Size Size Time Okay Errors Throughput
bytes bytes secs # # 10^6bits/sec
65536 4096 60.00 8452028 0 4615.93
65536 60.00 8442945 4610.97
Drat.
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-09 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-07 17:47 scheduler oddity [bug?] Balazs Scheidler
2009-03-07 18:47 ` Balazs Scheidler
2009-03-08 19:45 ` Balazs Scheidler
2009-03-08 22:03 ` Willy Tarreau
2009-03-09 3:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-03-09 11:19 ` David Newall
2009-03-08 9:42 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-03-08 9:58 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-03-08 10:02 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-03-08 10:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-08 13:35 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-03-08 15:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-08 16:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-03-08 17:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-08 18:39 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-03-08 18:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-09 4:10 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-03-09 6:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-09 8:02 ` [patch] " Mike Galbraith
2009-03-09 8:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-09 10:16 ` David Newall
2009-03-09 11:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-09 13:16 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-03-09 13:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-09 13:51 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-03-09 14:00 ` David Newall
2009-03-09 14:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-10 0:20 ` David Newall
2009-03-09 13:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-03-09 13:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-09 13:58 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-03-09 14:11 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2009-03-09 14:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-09 15:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-03-09 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-09 17:28 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-03-15 13:53 ` Balazs Scheidler
2009-03-15 17:16 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-03-15 18:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-16 11:55 ` Balazs Scheidler
2009-03-09 15:57 ` Balazs Scheidler
2009-03-10 3:16 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1236607890.6168.7.camel@marge.simson.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=bazsi@balabit.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox