From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935644AbaH0RVo (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2014 13:21:44 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]:34618 "EHLO mail-pa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935629AbaH0RVl (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2014 13:21:41 -0400 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Lee Jones Cc: Chris Zhong , robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, sameo@linux.intel.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, a.zummo@towertech.it, mturquette@linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, grant.likely@linaro.org, hl@rock-chips.com, huangtao@rock-chips.com, cf@rock-chips.com, zhangqing@rock-chips.com, xxx@rock-chips.com, dianders@chromium.org, heiko@sntech.de, olof@lixom.net, sonnyrao@chromium.org, javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk, kever.yang@rock-chips.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] MFD: RK808: Add new mfd driver for RK808 Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:21:38 -0700 Message-ID: <12367482.Ifp3ZtRrMQ@dtor-glaptop> User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-34-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20140827133936.GD6364@lee--X1> References: <1409062444-12019-1-git-send-email-zyw@rock-chips.com> <20140827133936.GD6364@lee--X1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, August 27, 2014 02:39:36 PM Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 26 Aug 2014, Chris Zhong wrote: > > + > > +static struct of_device_id rk808_of_match[] = { > > + { .compatible = "rockchip,rk808" }, > > +}; > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rk808_of_match); > > + > > +static const struct i2c_device_id rk808_ids[] = { > > + { "rk808" }, > > +}; > > + > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, rk808_ids); > > My OCD senses are tingling. Either have a blank line above the calls > to MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() or don't. Wait, don't we also need sentinel entries in both these tables? Thanks, Dmitry