public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>
To: akataria@vmware.com
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: move vmware to hypervisor
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:37:20 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1238000840.2500.49.camel@ht.satnam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1237999971.32497.12.camel@alok-dev1>

On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 09:52 -0700, Alok Kataria wrote:
> > 
> > vmware can be considered a CPU here, so i think making the disabling 
> > also depend on PROCESSOR_SELECT.
> 
> Ingo, this code is not just to be used by VMware, the reason we did this
> generically was so that a guest could run unaltered on *any* fully
> virtualized hypervisor.
> And give that this code is just a boot setup thing, the only thing this
> patch saves over here is not running the detection code on native
> systems. All the rest of the code is guarded by the
> "boot_cpu_data.x86_hyper_vendor" checks anyways.  
> 
> I don't really see the point of adding one more config option just for
> this. 
> 

Can you please explain what is the point of adding this support all the
time if this is useless for 99.9% of cases. IMHO, it should be optional.

--
JSR






  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-25 17:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-17  9:19 [PATCH -tip] x86: move vmware to hypervisor Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-17  9:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-17  9:48   ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-17 15:50     ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-25  5:29       ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-25 12:59         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-25 16:52           ` Alok Kataria
2009-03-25 17:07             ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput [this message]
2009-03-25 17:24               ` Alok Kataria
2009-03-25 17:38                 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-25 18:18                   ` Alok Kataria
2009-03-26  7:10                     ` david
2009-03-26 16:40                       ` Alok Kataria
2009-03-27  0:10                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-25 13:38         ` Mark Lord
2009-03-17 17:28 ` Alok Kataria

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1238000840.2500.49.camel@ht.satnam \
    --to=jaswinder@kernel.org \
    --cc=akataria@vmware.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox