From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: unification of cpu/bugs.c
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:12:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1238074955.2507.5.camel@ht.satnam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090326131236.GE3226@erda.amd.com>
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 14:12 +0100, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 26.03.09 17:32:09, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > This patch is based on -tip x86/core:
> >
> > From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
> > Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:14:38 +0530
> > Subject: [PATCH] x86: unification of cpu/bugs.c
> >
> > Impact: Unification, cleanup
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile | 5 +--
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c | 33 ------------------
> > 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
> > delete mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c
>
> Jaswinder,
>
> please send separate patches for separate changes (e.g. make separate
> whitespace changes).
>
Ok I removed cleanup:
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:14:38 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] x86: unification of cpu/bugs.c
Impact: unification
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile | 5 +--
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c | 33 --------------------------
3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
index 4e242f9..90a96ee 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
@@ -9,10 +9,9 @@ endif
obj-y := intel_cacheinfo.o addon_cpuid_features.o
obj-y += proc.o capflags.o powerflags.o common.o
-obj-y += vmware.o hypervisor.o
+obj-y += vmware.o hypervisor.o bugs.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_X86_32) += bugs.o cmpxchg.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_X86_64) += bugs_64.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_X86_32) += cmpxchg.o
obj-$(CONFIG_X86_CPU_DEBUG) += cpu_debug.o
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
index c8e315f..9be7218 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
@@ -6,17 +6,23 @@
* <rreilova@ececs.uc.edu>
* - Channing Corn (tests & fixes),
* - Andrew D. Balsa (code cleanup).
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2000 SuSE
*/
-#include <linux/init.h>
+
#include <linux/utsname.h>
-#include <asm/bugs.h>
-#include <asm/processor.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+
#include <asm/processor-flags.h>
+#include <asm/alternative.h>
+#include <asm/processor.h>
+#include <asm/paravirt.h>
#include <asm/i387.h>
+#include <asm/bugs.h>
#include <asm/msr.h>
-#include <asm/paravirt.h>
-#include <asm/alternative.h>
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
static int __init no_halt(char *s)
{
boot_cpu_data.hlt_works_ok = 0;
@@ -151,6 +157,22 @@ static void __init check_config(void)
#endif
}
+/*
+ * Check various bugs
+ */
+static void __init check_various_bugs(void)
+{
+ check_config();
+ check_fpu();
+ check_hlt();
+ check_popad();
+
+ init_utsname()->machine[1] =
+ '0' + (boot_cpu_data.x86 > 6 ? 6 : boot_cpu_data.x86);
+}
+#else /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
+static inline void __init check_various_bugs(void) {}
+#endif /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
void __init check_bugs(void)
{
@@ -159,11 +181,19 @@ void __init check_bugs(void)
printk("CPU: ");
print_cpu_info(&boot_cpu_data);
#endif
- check_config();
- check_fpu();
- check_hlt();
- check_popad();
- init_utsname()->machine[1] =
- '0' + (boot_cpu_data.x86 > 6 ? 6 : boot_cpu_data.x86);
+ check_various_bugs();
alternative_instructions();
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+ /*
+ * Make sure the first 2MB area is not mapped by huge pages
+ * There are typically fixed size MTRRs in there and overlapping
+ * MTRRs into large pages causes slow downs.
+ *
+ * Right now we don't do that with gbpages because there seems
+ * very little benefit for that case.
+ */
+ if (!direct_gbpages)
+ set_memory_4k((unsigned long)__va(0), 1);
+#endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 9a3ed06..0000000
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,33 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * Copyright (C) 1994 Linus Torvalds
- * Copyright (C) 2000 SuSE
- */
-
-#include <linux/kernel.h>
-#include <linux/init.h>
-#include <asm/alternative.h>
-#include <asm/bugs.h>
-#include <asm/processor.h>
-#include <asm/mtrr.h>
-#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
-
-void __init check_bugs(void)
-{
- identify_boot_cpu();
-#if !defined(CONFIG_SMP)
- printk("CPU: ");
- print_cpu_info(&boot_cpu_data);
-#endif
- alternative_instructions();
-
- /*
- * Make sure the first 2MB area is not mapped by huge pages
- * There are typically fixed size MTRRs in there and overlapping
- * MTRRs into large pages causes slow downs.
- *
- * Right now we don't do that with gbpages because there seems
- * very little benefit for that case.
- */
- if (!direct_gbpages)
- set_memory_4k((unsigned long)__va(0), 1);
-}
--
1.6.0.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-26 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-26 12:02 [PATCH -tip] x86: unification of cpu/bugs.c Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-26 13:12 ` Robert Richter
2009-03-26 13:42 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput [this message]
2009-03-26 14:12 ` Robert Richter
2009-03-26 14:29 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1238074955.2507.5.camel@ht.satnam \
--to=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox