public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>
To: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: unification of cpu/bugs.c
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:12:35 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1238074955.2507.5.camel@ht.satnam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090326131236.GE3226@erda.amd.com>

On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 14:12 +0100, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 26.03.09 17:32:09, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > This patch is based on -tip x86/core:
> > 
> > From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
> > Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:14:38 +0530
> > Subject: [PATCH] x86: unification of cpu/bugs.c
> > 
> > Impact: Unification, cleanup
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile  |    5 +--
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c    |   74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c |   33 ------------------
> >  3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
> >  delete mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c
> 
> Jaswinder,
> 
> please send separate patches for separate changes (e.g. make separate
> whitespace changes).
> 

Ok I removed cleanup:

From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:14:38 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] x86: unification of cpu/bugs.c

Impact: unification

Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile  |    5 +--
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c    |   52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c |   33 --------------------------
 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
index 4e242f9..90a96ee 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
@@ -9,10 +9,9 @@ endif
 
 obj-y			:= intel_cacheinfo.o addon_cpuid_features.o
 obj-y			+= proc.o capflags.o powerflags.o common.o
-obj-y			+= vmware.o hypervisor.o
+obj-y			+= vmware.o hypervisor.o bugs.o
 
-obj-$(CONFIG_X86_32)	+= bugs.o cmpxchg.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_X86_64)	+= bugs_64.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_X86_32)			+= cmpxchg.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_X86_CPU_DEBUG)		+= cpu_debug.o
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
index c8e315f..9be7218 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
@@ -6,17 +6,23 @@
  *        <rreilova@ececs.uc.edu>
  *	- Channing Corn (tests & fixes),
  *	- Andrew D. Balsa (code cleanup).
+ *
+ *  Copyright (C) 2000 SuSE
  */
-#include <linux/init.h>
+
 #include <linux/utsname.h>
-#include <asm/bugs.h>
-#include <asm/processor.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+
 #include <asm/processor-flags.h>
+#include <asm/alternative.h>
+#include <asm/processor.h>
+#include <asm/paravirt.h>
 #include <asm/i387.h>
+#include <asm/bugs.h>
 #include <asm/msr.h>
-#include <asm/paravirt.h>
-#include <asm/alternative.h>
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
 static int __init no_halt(char *s)
 {
 	boot_cpu_data.hlt_works_ok = 0;
@@ -151,6 +157,22 @@ static void __init check_config(void)
 #endif
 }
 
+/*
+ * Check various bugs
+ */
+static void __init check_various_bugs(void)
+{
+	check_config();
+	check_fpu();
+	check_hlt();
+	check_popad();
+
+	init_utsname()->machine[1] =
+		'0' + (boot_cpu_data.x86 > 6 ? 6 : boot_cpu_data.x86);
+}
+#else /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
+static inline void __init check_various_bugs(void) {}
+#endif /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
 
 void __init check_bugs(void)
 {
@@ -159,11 +181,19 @@ void __init check_bugs(void)
 	printk("CPU: ");
 	print_cpu_info(&boot_cpu_data);
 #endif
-	check_config();
-	check_fpu();
-	check_hlt();
-	check_popad();
-	init_utsname()->machine[1] =
-		'0' + (boot_cpu_data.x86 > 6 ? 6 : boot_cpu_data.x86);
+	check_various_bugs();
 	alternative_instructions();
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+	/*
+	 * Make sure the first 2MB area is not mapped by huge pages
+	 * There are typically fixed size MTRRs in there and overlapping
+	 * MTRRs into large pages causes slow downs.
+	 *
+	 * Right now we don't do that with gbpages because there seems
+	 * very little benefit for that case.
+	 */
+	if (!direct_gbpages)
+		set_memory_4k((unsigned long)__va(0), 1);
+#endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
 }
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 9a3ed06..0000000
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs_64.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,33 +0,0 @@
-/*
- *  Copyright (C) 1994  Linus Torvalds
- *  Copyright (C) 2000  SuSE
- */
-
-#include <linux/kernel.h>
-#include <linux/init.h>
-#include <asm/alternative.h>
-#include <asm/bugs.h>
-#include <asm/processor.h>
-#include <asm/mtrr.h>
-#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
-
-void __init check_bugs(void)
-{
-	identify_boot_cpu();
-#if !defined(CONFIG_SMP)
-	printk("CPU: ");
-	print_cpu_info(&boot_cpu_data);
-#endif
-	alternative_instructions();
-
-	/*
-	 * Make sure the first 2MB area is not mapped by huge pages
-	 * There are typically fixed size MTRRs in there and overlapping
-	 * MTRRs into large pages causes slow downs.
-	 *
-	 * Right now we don't do that with gbpages because there seems
-	 * very little benefit for that case.
-	 */
-	if (!direct_gbpages)
-		set_memory_4k((unsigned long)__va(0), 1);
-}
-- 
1.6.0.6




  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-26 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-26 12:02 [PATCH -tip] x86: unification of cpu/bugs.c Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-26 13:12 ` Robert Richter
2009-03-26 13:42   ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput [this message]
2009-03-26 14:12     ` Robert Richter
2009-03-26 14:29       ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1238074955.2507.5.camel@ht.satnam \
    --to=jaswinder@kernel.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox