public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
To: "david@lang.hm" <david@lang.hm>
Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: move vmware to hypervisor
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:40:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1238085621.21971.3.camel@alok-dev1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0903260008050.13440@asgard.lang.hm>

On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 00:10 -0700, david@lang.hm wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Alok Kataria wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 10:38 -0700, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> >> I am not saying we should not hide this behind a config at all. The
> >> point is there is nothing that we save by adding a new config, so what's
> >> the point at all. If you can give me a solid reason like, say, you save
> >> 1% code space with this config option, or 'n' sec in the boottime,  I am
> >> all ears for such an argument.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > So, if there are any tangible benefits with doing this I am ok with it,
> > but your current argument about "Freedom to user"  doesn't sound too
> > compelling.
> 
> isn't it the other way around? you are adding this in, it should be up to 
> you to show that it
> 
> A. has no impact
> 
> B. has a small enough impact that it's not worth the config option

This is what exactly I have mentioned in a mail earlier in this thread.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/25/333

Alok


  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-26 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-17  9:19 [PATCH -tip] x86: move vmware to hypervisor Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-17  9:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-17  9:48   ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-17 15:50     ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-25  5:29       ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-25 12:59         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-25 16:52           ` Alok Kataria
2009-03-25 17:07             ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-25 17:24               ` Alok Kataria
2009-03-25 17:38                 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-03-25 18:18                   ` Alok Kataria
2009-03-26  7:10                     ` david
2009-03-26 16:40                       ` Alok Kataria [this message]
2009-03-27  0:10                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-25 13:38         ` Mark Lord
2009-03-17 17:28 ` Alok Kataria

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1238085621.21971.3.camel@alok-dev1 \
    --to=akataria@vmware.com \
    --cc=david@lang.hm \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jaswinder@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox