From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Subject: [RFC] x86: gup_fast() batch limit (was: DRM lock ordering fix series)
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:22:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1238242929.4039.706.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1238237283.4039.605.camel@laptop>
On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 11:48 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 09:46 +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> > Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > Also note that doing large gup() with gup_fast() will be undesirable due
> > > to it disabling IRQs. So iterating say several MB worth of pages will
> > > hurt like crazy. Currently all gup_fast() users do a single page lookup.
> > >
> >
> > In 2.6.29, fs/bio.c:955, fs/direct-io.c:153 and fs/splice.c:1222 do
> > multiple-pages lookup at once. The latter might be limited to 16 pages
> > because of the pipe-depth, I don't know about the formers.
> >
> > Is there some sort of reasonable limit? A couple dozens pages at once maybe?
>
> Depends on your latency requirements, looking at the code I'd say we'd
> have to add that batch limit the comment talks about. I'd see preempt-rt
> wanting to lower that significantly.
>
> Regular mainline could do with 32-64 I guess, max irq latency is well
> over 10ms on mainline anyway.
I'm not really trusting my brain today, but something like the below
should work I think.
Nick, any thoughts?
Not-Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
arch/x86/mm/gup.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/gup.c b/arch/x86/mm/gup.c
index be54176..4ded5c3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/gup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/gup.c
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
#include <asm/pgtable.h>
+#define GUP_BATCH 32
+
static inline pte_t gup_get_pte(pte_t *ptep)
{
#ifndef CONFIG_X86_PAE
@@ -91,7 +93,8 @@ static noinline int gup_pte_range(pmd_t pmd, unsigned long addr,
get_page(page);
pages[*nr] = page;
(*nr)++;
-
+ if (*nr > GUP_BATCH)
+ break;
} while (ptep++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
pte_unmap(ptep - 1);
@@ -157,6 +160,8 @@ static int gup_pmd_range(pud_t pud, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
if (!gup_pte_range(pmd, addr, next, write, pages, nr))
return 0;
}
+ if (*nr > GUP_BATCH)
+ break;
} while (pmdp++, addr = next, addr != end);
return 1;
@@ -214,6 +219,8 @@ static int gup_pud_range(pgd_t pgd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
if (!gup_pmd_range(pud, addr, next, write, pages, nr))
return 0;
}
+ if (*nr > GUP_BATCH)
+ break;
} while (pudp++, addr = next, addr != end);
return 1;
@@ -226,7 +233,7 @@ int get_user_pages_fast(unsigned long start, int nr_pages, int write,
unsigned long addr, len, end;
unsigned long next;
pgd_t *pgdp;
- int nr = 0;
+ int batch = 0, nr = 0;
start &= PAGE_MASK;
addr = start;
@@ -254,6 +261,7 @@ int get_user_pages_fast(unsigned long start, int nr_pages, int write,
* (which we do on x86, with the above PAE exception), we can follow the
* address down to the the page and take a ref on it.
*/
+again:
local_irq_disable();
pgdp = pgd_offset(mm, addr);
do {
@@ -262,11 +270,21 @@ int get_user_pages_fast(unsigned long start, int nr_pages, int write,
next = pgd_addr_end(addr, end);
if (pgd_none(pgd))
goto slow;
- if (!gup_pud_range(pgd, addr, next, write, pages, &nr))
+ if (!gup_pud_range(pgd, addr, next, write, pages, &batch))
goto slow;
+ if (batch > GUP_BATCH) {
+ local_irq_enable();
+ addr += batch << PAGE_SHIFT;
+ nr += batch;
+ batch = 0;
+ if (addr != end)
+ goto again;
+ }
} while (pgdp++, addr = next, addr != end);
local_irq_enable();
+ nr += batch;
+
VM_BUG_ON(nr != (end - start) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
return nr;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-28 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-25 21:45 DRM lock ordering fix series Eric Anholt
2009-03-25 21:45 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Fix lock order reversal in GTT pwrite path Eric Anholt
2009-03-25 21:45 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Make GEM object's page lists refcounted instead of get/free Eric Anholt
2009-03-25 21:45 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Fix lock order reversal in shmem pwrite path Eric Anholt
2009-03-25 21:45 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Fix lock order reversal in shmem pread path Eric Anholt
2009-03-25 21:45 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Fix lock order reversal with cliprects and cmdbuf in non-DRI2 paths Eric Anholt
2009-03-25 21:45 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Fix lock order reversal in GEM relocation entry copying Eric Anholt
2009-03-30 10:00 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Fix lock order reversal in GEM relocation entry copying. -- makes X hang Florian Mickler
2009-03-31 19:36 ` Eric Anholt
2009-04-01 0:12 ` Florian Mickler
2009-03-27 0:52 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Fix lock order reversal with cliprects and cmdbuf in non-DRI2 paths Jesse Barnes
2009-03-25 23:30 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Fix lock order reversal in shmem pread path Dave Airlie
2009-03-26 4:03 ` Keith Packard
2009-03-27 0:50 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-03-27 0:50 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Fix lock order reversal in shmem pwrite path Jesse Barnes
2009-03-25 22:52 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Make GEM object's page lists refcounted instead of get/free Dave Airlie
2009-03-26 19:59 ` Eric Anholt
2009-03-27 0:47 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-03-27 0:43 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Fix lock order reversal in GTT pwrite path Jesse Barnes
2009-03-27 16:56 ` Eric Anholt
2009-03-27 17:07 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-03-28 0:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-28 2:35 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-03-28 5:22 ` Dave Airlie
2009-03-27 9:34 ` DRM lock ordering fix series Andi Kleen
2009-03-27 16:19 ` Eric Anholt
2009-03-27 16:36 ` Eric Anholt
2009-03-27 18:10 ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-27 20:10 ` Eric Anholt
2009-03-27 21:05 ` Andi Kleen
2009-03-28 0:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-28 1:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-30 6:29 ` Eric Anholt
2009-03-28 8:46 ` Brice Goglin
2009-03-28 10:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-28 12:22 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-03-28 12:46 ` [RFC] x86: gup_fast() batch limit (was: DRM lock ordering fix series) Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-02 11:19 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-24 13:46 ` [RFC] x86: gup_fast() batch limit Brice Goglin
2009-06-24 17:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-24 19:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1238242929.4039.706.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=Brice.Goglin@inria.fr \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox