From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754620AbZDGLe1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2009 07:34:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751266AbZDGLeS (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2009 07:34:18 -0400 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:51517 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750920AbZDGLeR (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2009 07:34:17 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC] Static/Runtime CPU/IO bound scheduling polices based on CPU(s) to support complete spectrum of tasks From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput To: Andi Kleen Cc: Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , David Woodhouse , Peter Zijlstra , David Miller , Steven Rostedt , LKML , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Alan Cox In-Reply-To: <20090407105835.GP17934@one.firstfloor.org> References: <1239099931.4773.25.camel@ht.satnam> <20090407105835.GP17934@one.firstfloor.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:02:31 +0530 Message-Id: <1239103951.4773.29.camel@ht.satnam> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 (2.24.5-1.fc10) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 12:58 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 03:55:31PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > > I am planning to prepare the followings: > > This seems all quite vague. Perhaps it would be good if you started > with a clear definition what problem you're trying to solve. > This will solves 2 major problems: 1. Support complete task spectrum (Hard/soft/non Realtime) on one system. 2. Take Maximum advantage of the each CPU core and treat each CPU core as a System. So we can take maximum utilization of the Hardware. -- JSR