From: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>,
"avri.altman@wdc.com" <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
"jejb@linux.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"asutoshd@codeaurora.org" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>,
"beanhuo@micron.com" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
"stanley.chu@mediatek.com" <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
"cang@codeaurora.org" <cang@codeaurora.org>,
"tomas.winkler@intel.com" <tomas.winkler@intel.com>,
ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sang-yoon Oh <sangyoon.oh@samsung.com>,
Sung-Jun Park <sungjun07.park@samsung.com>,
yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@samsung.com>,
Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@samsung.com>,
Adel Choi <adel.choi@samsung.com>,
BoRam Shin <boram.shin@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/4] scsi: ufs: L2P map management for HPB read
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 09:21:10 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1239183618.61598919782940.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5587cf86-eeec-2c70-a47c-57149f00eb95@acm.org>
Hi Bart,
> > +static unsigned int ufshpb_host_map_kbytes = 1024;
>
> A comment that explains where this value comes from would be welcome.
I will add a follows comment and change defalut value 1024 to 2048.
"A cache size of 2MB can cache ppn in the 1GB range."
> > +static struct ufshpb_req *ufshpb_get_map_req(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb,
> > + struct ufshpb_subregion *srgn)
> > +{
> > + struct ufshpb_req *map_req;
> > + struct request *req;
> > + struct bio *bio;
> > +
> > + map_req = kmem_cache_alloc(hpb->map_req_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!map_req)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + req = blk_get_request(hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->request_queue,
> > + REQ_OP_SCSI_IN, BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT);
>
> Why BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT? Since this code is only executed while medium access
> commands are processed and since none of these commands have the PREEMPT flag
> set I think that the PREEMPT flag should be left out. Otherwise there probably
> will be weird interactions with runtime suspended devices.
OK, I will remove BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT flag.
> Is it acceptable that the above blk_get_request() call blocks if a UFS device
> has been runtime suspended? If not, consider using the flag BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT
> instead.
The map worker don't issue map requests when the UFS device is in
runtime suspend. So, I think BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT flags is not needed.
> > + bio = bio_alloc(GFP_KERNEL, hpb->pages_per_srgn);
> > + if (!bio) {
> > + blk_put_request(req);
> > + goto free_map_req;
> > + }
>
> If the blk_get_request() would be modified such that it doesn't wait, this
> call may have to be modified too (GFP_NOWAIT?).
>
> > + if (rgn->rgn_state == HPB_RGN_INACTIVE) {
> > + if (atomic_read(&lru_info->active_cnt)
> > + == lru_info->max_lru_active_cnt) {
>
> When splitting a line, please put comparison operators at the end of the line
> instead of at the start, e.g. as follows:
>
> if (atomic_read(&lru_info->active_cnt) ==
> lru_info->max_lru_active_cnt) {
OK, I will change it.
> > + pool_size = DIV_ROUND_UP(ufshpb_host_map_kbytes * 1024, PAGE_SIZE);
>
> Please use PAGE_ALIGN() to align to the next page boundary.
OK, I will.
Thanks,
Daejun.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-01 0:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20200828070950epcms2p5470bd43374be18d184dd802da09e73c8@epcms2p5>
2020-08-28 7:09 ` [PATCH v9 0/4] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support Daejun Park
2020-08-28 7:17 ` [PATCH v9 1/4] scsi: ufs: Add HPB feature related parameters Daejun Park
2020-08-29 23:11 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-08-28 7:18 ` [PATCH v9 2/4] scsi: ufs: Introduce HPB feature Daejun Park
2020-08-29 22:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-09-01 0:24 ` Daejun Park
2020-08-28 7:19 ` [PATCH v9 3/4] scsi: ufs: L2P map management for HPB read Daejun Park
2020-08-29 23:48 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-09-01 0:21 ` Daejun Park [this message]
2020-08-28 7:19 ` [PATCH v9 4/4] scsi: ufs: Prepare HPB read for cached sub-region Daejun Park
2020-08-29 23:54 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1239183618.61598919782940.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp2 \
--to=daejun7.park@samsung.com \
--cc=adel.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=boram.shin@samsung.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=j-young.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=sangyoon.oh@samsung.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=sungjun07.park@samsung.com \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
--cc=ymhungry.lee@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox