From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham-lkml@crca.org.au>
To: Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] do not count frozen tasks toward load
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:21:43 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1239240103.9869.1.camel@nigel-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090408194512.47a99b95@manatee.lan>
Hi again.
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 19:45 -0500, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> Freezing tasks via the cgroup freezer causes the load average to climb
> because the freezer's current implementation puts frozen tasks in
> uninterruptible sleep (D state).
>
> Some applications which perform job-scheduling functions consult the
> load average when making decisions. If a cgroup is frozen, the load
> average does not provide a useful measure of the system's utilization
> to such applications. This is especially inconvenient if the job
> scheduler employs the cgroup freezer as a mechanism for preempting low
> priority jobs. Contrast this with using SIGSTOP for the same purpose:
> the stopped tasks do not count toward system load.
>
> Change task_contributes_to_load() to return false if the task is
> frozen. This results in /proc/loadavg behavior that better meets
> users' expectations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 011db2f..f8af167 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -202,7 +202,8 @@ extern unsigned long long time_sync_thresh;
> #define task_is_stopped_or_traced(task) \
> ((task->state & (__TASK_STOPPED | __TASK_TRACED)) != 0)
> #define task_contributes_to_load(task) \
> - ((task->state & TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) != 0)
> + ((task->state & TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) != 0 && \
> + (task->flags & PF_FROZEN) == 0)
>
> #define __set_task_state(tsk, state_value) \
> do { (tsk)->state = (state_value); } while (0)
Tested-by: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@tuxonice.net>
Looks good to me (though I like Andrew's point about using task_frozen).
nigel@nigel-laptop:~$ cat /proc/loadavg
0.34 0.27 0.12 1/251 9001
nigel@nigel-laptop:~$ sudo hibernate
nigel@nigel-laptop:~$ cat /proc/loadavg
0.52 0.33 0.14 2/250 9807
nigel@nigel-laptop:~$
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-09 1:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-09 0:45 [PATCH/RFC] do not count frozen tasks toward load Nathan Lynch
2009-04-09 0:56 ` Nigel Cunningham
2009-04-09 0:57 ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-09 1:21 ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
2009-04-09 4:37 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: " Nathan Lynch
2009-04-09 5:39 ` Nathan Lynch
2009-04-10 9:20 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1239240103.9869.1.camel@nigel-laptop \
--to=ncunningham-lkml@crca.org.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ntl@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox