From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: ftrace.c declare prepare_ftrace_return before they get used
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 23:11:55 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1239298915.3296.24.camel@ht.satnam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090409172053.GA6033@nowhere>
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 19:20 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 10:07:48PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > Impact: fix sparse warning:
> > arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c:411:6: warning: symbol 'prepare_ftrace_return' was not declared. Should it be static?
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h | 6 ++++++
> > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> > index bd2c651..49616d4 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
> > @@ -62,4 +62,10 @@ struct dyn_arch_ftrace {
> > #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> > #endif /* CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER */
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
> > +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> > +extern void prepare_ftrace_return(unsigned long *, unsigned long);
>
>
> But it is only used from asm code so there is no need to make
> its prototype public.
>
> I don't think this is necessary but if you really think it is, then I would prefer
> you use the already existing #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ block.
>
Like this:
Subject: [PATCH] x86: ftrace.c declare prepare_ftrace_return before they get used
Impact: fix sparse warning:
arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c:411:6: warning: symbol 'prepare_ftrace_return' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h | 5 +++++
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
index bd2c651..ddc9236 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/ftrace.h
@@ -59,6 +59,11 @@ struct dyn_arch_ftrace {
};
#endif /* CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
+extern void prepare_ftrace_return(unsigned long *, unsigned long);
+#endif
+
#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
#endif /* CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER */
--
1.6.0.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-09 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-09 16:37 [PATCH -tip] x86: ftrace.c declare prepare_ftrace_return before they get used Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-04-09 17:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-04-09 17:41 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput [this message]
2009-04-09 18:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-10 4:29 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-04-10 12:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1239298915.3296.24.camel@ht.satnam \
--to=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox