The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: k8.h reference to node in node_to_k8_nb_misc for !CONFIG_K8_NB
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:04:37 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1239730477.2966.26.camel@ht.satnam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090414171756.GA18510@elte.hu>

On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 19:17 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> I.e. convert node_to_k8_nb_misc() from a macro to an inline 
> function. Same end result in terms of emitted instructions, 
> but the compiler now knows that 'node' is really used.
> 
> With a macro the preprocessor hid this fact from the 
> compiler, so the compiler only saw this in essence:
> 
>         int node = 0;
>         struct pci_dev *dev;
> 
> and thought that 'node' was unused. Hence it emitted a 
> warning. This is one reason why macros are bad - they hide 
> program logic from the compiler.
> 

Subject: [PATCH] x86: k8 convert node_to_k8_nb_misc() from a macro to an inline function

Converting node_to_k8_nb_misc() from a macro to an inline function
makes complier happy for !CONFIG_K8_NB so fixes compiler warnings:
  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c: In function ‘show_cache_disable’:
  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c:712: warning: unused variable ‘node’
  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c: In function ‘store_cache_disable’:
  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c:739: warning: unused variable ‘node’

Thanks to Ingo for the guidance.

Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/k8.h |   11 ++++++++---
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/k8.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/k8.h
index c23b3d1..c2d1f3b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/k8.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/k8.h
@@ -13,10 +13,15 @@ extern void k8_flush_garts(void);
 extern int k8_scan_nodes(unsigned long start, unsigned long end);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_K8_NB
-#define node_to_k8_nb_misc(node) \
-	(node < num_k8_northbridges) ? k8_northbridges[node] : NULL
+static inline struct pci_dev *node_to_k8_nb_misc(int node)
+{
+	return (node < num_k8_northbridges) ? k8_northbridges[node] : NULL;
+}
 #else
-#define node_to_k8_nb_misc(node) NULL
+static inline struct pci_dev *node_to_k8_nb_misc(int node)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
 #endif
 
 
-- 
1.6.0.6




      reply	other threads:[~2009-04-14 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-14 16:45 [PATCH -tip] x86: k8.h reference to node in node_to_k8_nb_misc for !CONFIG_K8_NB Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-04-14 16:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-14 17:07   ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-04-14 17:17     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-14 17:34       ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1239730477.2966.26.camel@ht.satnam \
    --to=jaswinder@kernel.org \
    --cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.langsdorf@amd.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox