Re: RFC: introduce struct ksymbol

Rusty Russell
2009-04-15T10:52:00Z

On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:28:39 pm Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Why not 'struct ksym'? That name is unused right now, it is shorter
> and just as descriptive.
>
> Regarding the change... dunno. Sam, Rusty - what do you think?

Yes, ksym is nice. But agree with you that it's marginal obfuscation
to wrap it in a struct.

The current symbol printing APIs are awful; we should address them first
(like the %pF patch does) IMHO.

Cheers,
Rusty.