From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755346AbZDRIVL (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Apr 2009 04:21:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751660AbZDRIU4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Apr 2009 04:20:56 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.227]:34544 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751646AbZDRIUz (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Apr 2009 04:20:55 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; b=VVOWF1a5cBPjBMV2PrU2TJPJnYawqJqRzuPr7GyeMDj2dA8x7PDAAMYUydWuWBVnKy cVXb2H7TuaK3FX32XajWco/eS2RJuCGgFhF/leCiXyn5JhLfQEJNw0418q868Is3puSB qu9BH8QR80U7QeFgl5OuAvexu/ViTpmoChFN4= Subject: ACPI Exception (evregion-0422): AE_ERROR From: "Justin P. Mattock" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 01:21:10 -0700 Message-Id: <1240042870.12779.5.camel@unix> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I'm seeing this in dmesg: [ 10.026103] hub 1-1:1.0: 3 ports detected [ 10.103940] nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints kernel. [ 10.192783] usb 1-4: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 3 [ 10.375881] usb 1-4: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice [ 10.381849] ACPI Exception (evregion-0422): AE_ERROR, Returned by Handler for [PCI_Config] [20081204] [ 10.381864] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.RP01.GFX0._PS0] (Node f703ecc0), AE_ERROR [ 10.381974] ACPI: Transitioning device [GFX0] to D0 [ 10.381987] nvidia 0000:02:00.0: PCI INT A -> Link[Z003] -> GSI 23 (level, low) -> IRQ 23 [ 10.381994] nvidia 0000:02:00.0: setting latency timer to 64 I do have a proprietary module(cant help that), but doesn't make a difference.(still shows up irregardless); should I be concerned with this from ACPI? regards; Justin P. Mattock