From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bzolnier@gmail.com
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 03/14] block: don't set REQ_NOMERGE unnecessarily
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:37:50 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1240331881-28218-4-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1240331881-28218-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
RQ_NOMERGE_FLAGS already clears defines which REQ flags aren't
mergeable. There is no reason to specify it superflously. It only
adds to confusion. Don't set REQ_NOMERGE for barriers and requests
with specific queueing directive. REQ_NOMERGE is now exclusively used
by the merging code.
[ Impact: cleanup ]
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
block/blk-core.c | 5 +----
block/blk-exec.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index d4c7260..bcc85ec 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -1080,16 +1080,13 @@ void init_request_from_bio(struct request *req, struct bio *bio)
if (bio_failfast_driver(bio))
req->cmd_flags |= REQ_FAILFAST_DRIVER;
- /*
- * REQ_BARRIER implies no merging, but lets make it explicit
- */
if (unlikely(bio_discard(bio))) {
req->cmd_flags |= REQ_DISCARD;
if (bio_barrier(bio))
req->cmd_flags |= REQ_SOFTBARRIER;
req->q->prepare_discard_fn(req->q, req);
} else if (unlikely(bio_barrier(bio)))
- req->cmd_flags |= (REQ_HARDBARRIER | REQ_NOMERGE);
+ req->cmd_flags |= REQ_HARDBARRIER;
if (bio_sync(bio))
req->cmd_flags |= REQ_RW_SYNC;
diff --git a/block/blk-exec.c b/block/blk-exec.c
index 6af716d..49557e9 100644
--- a/block/blk-exec.c
+++ b/block/blk-exec.c
@@ -51,7 +51,6 @@ void blk_execute_rq_nowait(struct request_queue *q, struct gendisk *bd_disk,
int where = at_head ? ELEVATOR_INSERT_FRONT : ELEVATOR_INSERT_BACK;
rq->rq_disk = bd_disk;
- rq->cmd_flags |= REQ_NOMERGE;
rq->end_io = done;
WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());
spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
--
1.6.0.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-21 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-21 16:37 [GIT PATCH linux-2.6-block] block: cleanup patches, take#3 Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:37 ` [PATCH 01/14] block: merge blk_invoke_request_fn() into __blk_run_queue() Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:37 ` [PATCH 02/14] block: kill blk_start_queueing() Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:37 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-04-21 16:37 ` [PATCH 04/14] block: cleanup REQ_SOFTBARRIER usages Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:37 ` [PATCH 05/14] block: clean up misc stuff after block layer timeout conversion Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:37 ` [PATCH 06/14] block: reorder request completion functions Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:37 ` [PATCH 07/14] block: reorganize request fetching functions Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 17:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-04-22 10:09 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-23 1:23 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:37 ` [PATCH 08/14] block: kill blk_end_request_callback() Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:37 ` [PATCH 09/14] block: clean up request completion API Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 17:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-04-23 1:24 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-23 2:08 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2009-04-23 9:43 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-04-23 9:59 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:37 ` [PATCH 10/14] block: move rq->start_time initialization to blk_rq_init() Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:37 ` [PATCH 11/14] block: implement and use [__]blk_end_request_all() Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:37 ` [PATCH 12/14] block: replace end_request() with [__]blk_end_request_cur() Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 18:25 ` Joerg Dorchain
2009-04-21 20:35 ` Laurent Vivier
2009-04-22 9:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-04-22 16:04 ` Grant Likely
2009-04-21 16:38 ` [PATCH 13/14] block: don't abuse rq->data Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:38 ` [PATCH 14/14] block-kill-data Tejun Heo
2009-04-21 16:42 ` [PATCH 14/14] block: kill rq->data Tejun Heo
2009-04-22 10:10 ` [GIT PATCH linux-2.6-block] block: cleanup patches, take#3 Jens Axboe
2009-04-23 2:10 ` Tejun Heo
2009-04-23 6:09 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-03-13 5:02 [GIT PATCH] block: cleanup patches Tejun Heo
2009-03-13 5:02 ` [PATCH 03/14] block: don't set REQ_NOMERGE unnecessarily Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1240331881-28218-4-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox