public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Han, Weidong" <weidong.han@intel.com>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/5] x2apic, IR: remove reinit_intr_remapped_IO_APIC()
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:24:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1240338284.27006.8519.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090421070130.GC22937@elte.hu>

On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 00:01 -0700, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Han, Weidong <weidong.han@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> > > When interrupt-remapping is enabled, We are relying on
> > > setup_IO_APIC_irqs() 
> > > to configure remapped entries in the IO-APIC, which comes little bit
> > > later after enabling interrupt-remapping.
> > > 
> > > Meanwhile, Restore of old io-apic entries after enabling
> > > interrupt-remapping will not make the interrupts through io-apic
> > > functional anyway. 
> > > 
> > > So remove unnecessary reinit_intr_remapped_IO_APIC().
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Weidong Han <weidong.han@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > Index: tip/arch/x86/include/asm/io_apic.h
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- tip.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/io_apic.h
> > > +++ tip/arch/x86/include/asm/io_apic.h
> > > @@ -166,8 +166,6 @@ extern void free_ioapic_entries(struct I
> > >  extern int save_IO_APIC_setup(struct IO_APIC_route_entry
> > >  **ioapic_entries); extern void mask_IO_APIC_setup(struct
> > >  IO_APIC_route_entry **ioapic_entries); extern int
> > > restore_IO_APIC_setup(struct IO_APIC_route_entry **ioapic_entries); 
> > > -extern void reinit_intr_remapped_IO_APIC(int intr_remapping,
> > > -	struct IO_APIC_route_entry **ioapic_entries);
> > > 
> > >  extern void probe_nr_irqs_gsi(void);
> > > 
> > > Index: tip/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- tip.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> > > +++ tip/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> > > @@ -1416,8 +1416,6 @@ end_restore:
> > >  		 * IR enabling failed
> > >  		 */
> > >  		restore_IO_APIC_setup(ioapic_entries);
> > > -	else
> > > -		reinit_intr_remapped_IO_APIC(x2apic_preenabled, ioapic_entries);
> > 
> > Whether IR enabling succeeds or fails, it always needs to restore 
> > old IOAPIC entries. Due to removing reinit_intr_remapped_IO_APIC 
> > here, it needs to also remove the "if (ret)" before 
> > restore_IO_APIC_setup(ioapic_entries);
> 
> Ok - i skipped this patch for now.

Let me clarify what I am doing in this patch:

When interrupt-remapping is enabled, IO-APIC entries need to be setup in
the re-mappable format (pointing to interrupt-remapping table entries
setup by the OS). This remapping configuration is happening in the same
place where we traditionally configure IO-APIC (i.e., in
setup_IO_APIC_irqs()).

So when we enable interrupt-remapping successfully, there is no need to
restore old io-apic RTE entries before we actually do a complete
configuration shortly in setup_IO_APIC_irqs(). Old IO-APIC RTE's may be
in traditional format (non re-mappable) or in re-mappable format
pointing to interrupt-remapping table entries setup by BIOS. Restoring
both of these will not make IO-APIC functional. We have to rely on
setup_IO_APIC_irqs() for proper configuration by OS.

So I am removing this unnecessary and broken step.

When enabling interrupt-remapping is not successful, we are doing plain
restore of old RTE's (which will still work as we went back to original
no-remapping state). Complete IO-APIC configuration will be done shortly
in setup_IO_APIC_irqs().

thanks,
suresh


  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-21 18:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-20 20:02 [patch 1/5] x2apic, IR: cleanup X86_X2APIC and INTR_REMAP config checks Suresh Siddha
2009-04-20 20:02 ` [patch 2/5] x2apic, IR: Fix compiler warning with !CONFIG_INTR_REMAP Suresh Siddha
2009-04-21  8:07   ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: x2apic, IR: Move eoi_ioapic_irq() into a CONFIG_INTR_REMAP section tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2009-04-21 14:04     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-04-20 20:02 ` [patch 3/5] x2apic, IR: cleanup panic() with nox2apic boot option Suresh Siddha
2009-04-21  7:01   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-21  8:07   ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: x2apic, IR: Clean up " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2009-04-20 20:02 ` [patch 4/5] x2apic, IR: remove reinit_intr_remapped_IO_APIC() Suresh Siddha
2009-04-21  6:37   ` Han, Weidong
2009-04-21  7:01     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-21 18:24       ` Suresh Siddha [this message]
2009-04-22  2:55         ` Han, Weidong
2009-04-22 10:03           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-22 10:06   ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2009-04-20 20:02 ` [patch 5/5] x2apic, IR: Make config X86_UV dependent on X86_X2APIC Suresh Siddha
2009-04-20 20:33   ` Jack Steiner
2009-04-21  8:07   ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2009-04-21  6:58 ` [patch 1/5] x2apic, IR: cleanup X86_X2APIC and INTR_REMAP config checks Ingo Molnar
2009-04-21  8:06 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: x2apic, IR: Clean up " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1240338284.27006.8519.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=weidong.han@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox