From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.lichtvoll.de (lichtvoll.de [89.58.27.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4236E16C848; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 12:11:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=89.58.27.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712319076; cv=none; b=u1ih0yLgiqnQAk7YwN/Cd/AowQAEpPZ3V0YBkI/dy4oKK3Z2T1U4wZdDU3bjWANBdTcgTXkiq1dbZjq+ViwRL1rIRxJPgeR+cpyjz/vnRvPKhu/T9dF+gWFrhRvFg0zhqskM6YHgZxaDTEx28BLx+yW296k8JhufIr5odXGTagk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712319076; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IdzR1y2QIYzGNLja2EK6IzKu8gw7dJV0V1YeBsnEZ+w=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=g1b3zbP+r1n2kCnuNj4xKh8B4RiiMDgMEZ0QpqQillQ1lj3gPZL1m2xqytWwcUXOYRAQXMkyBwjFWAoyJF9VhIDmUigAXdzjZLj11H5H7Gc/ferDLzpw7P3evmo5vsd4g1NDKKwsJOgWq7kdJHE16eXBK0xmP11cUHAco0AtJOM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lichtvoll.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lichtvoll.de; arc=none smtp.client-ip=89.58.27.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lichtvoll.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lichtvoll.de Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lichtvoll.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 23BF1A178; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 12:11:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.lichtvoll.de; auth=pass smtp.auth=martin@lichtvoll.de smtp.mailfrom=martin@lichtvoll.de From: Martin Steigerwald To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux regressions mailing list Subject: Re: [regression] 6.8.1 and 6.7.12: fails to hibernate with pm_runtime_force_suspend+0x0/0x120 returns -16 Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 14:11:11 +0200 Message-ID: <12414153.O9o76ZdvQC@lichtvoll.de> In-Reply-To: <12413606.O9o76ZdvQC@lichtvoll.de> References: <2325246.ElGaqSPkdT@lichtvoll.de> <6034738.lOV4Wx5bFT@lichtvoll.de> <12413606.O9o76ZdvQC@lichtvoll.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Martin Steigerwald - 05.04.24, 13:54:34 CEST: > > Not doing it today or probably the weekend, but now I have some > > actionable git bisect plan without bisecting between major kernel > > releases which as I have been told between 6.7 an 6.8-rc1 can lead to > > non working modeset graphics on AMD Ryzen in between. > > > > It seems now I only need to git bisect between 6.7.11 and 6.7.12 to > > find the patch that breaks hibernation on 6.8.1 as well. However > > first I will briefly check whether 6.8.4 hibernates okay. > > 6.8.4 is still affected and fails hibernation with the same error > message. Both kernels also fail to reboot the machine. Runit says: - runit: system reboot And then nothing anymore. It is not just hibernation. I think ThinkPad T14 AMD Gen 1 or similar systems with Linux are not that rare. I am surprised this is not hitting more people. Well maybe it does and no one reported it here. Well let's see what happens when 6.7.12 hits distribution kernels. Anyway, I have an actionable git bisect between 6.7.11 and 6.7.12, just not today. Maybe beginning of next week. -- Martin