linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: nauman@google.com, dpshah@google.com, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com,
	mikew@google.com, fchecconi@gmail.com, paolo.valente@unimore.it,
	jens.axboe@oracle.com, ryov@valinux.co.jp,
	fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp, s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com,
	taka@valinux.co.jp, guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com,
	jmoyer@redhat.com, dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, righi.andrea@gmail.com,
	agk@redhat.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com,
	m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com
Cc: vgoyal@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/18] io-controller: Charge for time slice based on average disk rate
Date: Tue,  5 May 2009 15:58:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1241553525-28095-4-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1241553525-28095-1-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com>

o There are situations where a queue gets expired very soon and it looks
  as if time slice used by that queue is zero. For example, If an async
  queue dispatches a bunch of requests and queue is expired before first
  request completes. Another example is where a queue is expired as soon
  as first request completes and queue has no more requests (sync queues
  on SSD).

o Currently we just charge 25% of slice length in such cases. This patch tries
  to improve on that approximation by keeping a track of average disk rate
  and charging for time by nr_sectors/disk_rate.

o This is still experimental, not very sure if it gives measurable improvement
  or not.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
---
 block/elevator-fq.c |   85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 block/elevator-fq.h |   11 ++++++
 2 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/elevator-fq.c b/block/elevator-fq.c
index 9aea899..9f1fbb9 100644
--- a/block/elevator-fq.c
+++ b/block/elevator-fq.c
@@ -19,6 +19,9 @@ const int elv_slice_async_rq = 2;
 int elv_slice_idle = HZ / 125;
 static struct kmem_cache *elv_ioq_pool;
 
+/* Maximum Window length for updating average disk rate */
+static int elv_rate_sampling_window = HZ / 10;
+
 #define ELV_SLICE_SCALE		(5)
 #define ELV_HW_QUEUE_MIN	(5)
 #define IO_SERVICE_TREE_INIT   ((struct io_service_tree)		\
@@ -1022,6 +1025,47 @@ static void elv_ioq_update_io_thinktime(struct io_queue *ioq)
 	ioq->ttime_mean = (ioq->ttime_total + 128) / ioq->ttime_samples;
 }
 
+static void elv_update_io_rate(struct elv_fq_data *efqd, struct request *rq)
+{
+	long elapsed = jiffies - efqd->rate_sampling_start;
+	unsigned long total;
+
+	/* sampling window is off */
+	if (!efqd->rate_sampling_start)
+		return;
+
+	efqd->rate_sectors_current += rq->nr_sectors;
+
+	if (efqd->rq_in_driver && (elapsed < elv_rate_sampling_window))
+		return;
+
+	efqd->rate_sectors = (7*efqd->rate_sectors +
+				256*efqd->rate_sectors_current) / 8;
+
+	if (!elapsed) {
+		/*
+		 * updating rate before a jiffy could complete. Could be a
+		 * problem with fast queuing/non-queuing hardware. Should we
+		 * look at higher resolution time source?
+		 *
+		 * In case of non-queuing hardware we will probably not try to
+		 * dispatch from multiple queues and will be able to account
+		 * for disk time used and will not need this approximation
+		 * anyway?
+		 */
+		elapsed = 1;
+	}
+
+	efqd->rate_time = (7*efqd->rate_time + 256*elapsed) / 8;
+	total = efqd->rate_sectors + (efqd->rate_time/2);
+	efqd->mean_rate = total/efqd->rate_time;
+
+	elv_log(efqd, "mean_rate=%d, t=%d s=%d", efqd->mean_rate,
+			elapsed, efqd->rate_sectors_current);
+	efqd->rate_sampling_start = 0;
+	efqd->rate_sectors_current = 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * Disable idle window if the process thinks too long.
  * This idle flag can also be updated by io scheduler.
@@ -1312,6 +1356,34 @@ void elv_del_ioq_busy(struct elevator_queue *e, struct io_queue *ioq,
 }
 
 /*
+ * Calculate the effective disk time used by the queue based on how many
+ * sectors queue has dispatched and what is the average disk rate
+ * Returns disk time in ms.
+ */
+static inline unsigned long elv_disk_time_used(struct request_queue *q,
+					struct io_queue *ioq)
+{
+	struct elv_fq_data *efqd = &q->elevator->efqd;
+	struct io_entity *entity = &ioq->entity;
+	unsigned long jiffies_used = 0;
+
+	if (!efqd->mean_rate)
+		return entity->budget/4;
+
+	/* Charge the queue based on average disk rate */
+	jiffies_used = ioq->nr_sectors/efqd->mean_rate;
+
+	if (!jiffies_used)
+		jiffies_used = 1;
+
+	elv_log_ioq(efqd, ioq, "disk time=%ldms sect=%ld rate=%ld",
+				jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies_used),
+				ioq->nr_sectors, efqd->mean_rate);
+
+	return jiffies_used;
+}
+
+/*
  * Do the accounting. Determine how much service (in terms of time slices)
  * current queue used and adjust the start, finish time of queue and vtime
  * of the tree accordingly.
@@ -1363,7 +1435,7 @@ void __elv_ioq_slice_expired(struct request_queue *q, struct io_queue *ioq)
 	 * the requests to finish. But this will reduce throughput.
 	 */
 	if (!ioq->slice_end)
-		slice_used = entity->budget/4;
+		slice_used = elv_disk_time_used(q, ioq);
 	else {
 		if (time_after(ioq->slice_end, jiffies)) {
 			slice_unused = ioq->slice_end - jiffies;
@@ -1373,7 +1445,7 @@ void __elv_ioq_slice_expired(struct request_queue *q, struct io_queue *ioq)
 				 * completing first request. Charge 25% of
 				 * slice.
 				 */
-				slice_used = entity->budget/4;
+				slice_used = elv_disk_time_used(q, ioq);
 			} else
 				slice_used = entity->budget - slice_unused;
 		} else {
@@ -1391,6 +1463,8 @@ void __elv_ioq_slice_expired(struct request_queue *q, struct io_queue *ioq)
 	BUG_ON(ioq != efqd->active_queue);
 	elv_reset_active_ioq(efqd);
 
+	/* Queue is being expired. Reset number of secotrs dispatched */
+	ioq->nr_sectors = 0;
 	if (!ioq->nr_queued)
 		elv_del_ioq_busy(q->elevator, ioq, 1);
 	else
@@ -1725,6 +1799,7 @@ void elv_fq_dispatched_request(struct elevator_queue *e, struct request *rq)
 
 	BUG_ON(!ioq);
 	elv_ioq_request_dispatched(ioq);
+	ioq->nr_sectors += rq->nr_sectors;
 	elv_ioq_request_removed(e, rq);
 	elv_clear_ioq_must_dispatch(ioq);
 }
@@ -1737,6 +1812,10 @@ void elv_fq_activate_rq(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
 		return;
 
 	efqd->rq_in_driver++;
+
+	if (!efqd->rate_sampling_start)
+		efqd->rate_sampling_start = jiffies;
+
 	elv_log_ioq(efqd, rq_ioq(rq), "activate rq, drv=%d",
 						efqd->rq_in_driver);
 }
@@ -1826,6 +1905,8 @@ void elv_ioq_completed_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
 	efqd->rq_in_driver--;
 	ioq->dispatched--;
 
+	elv_update_io_rate(efqd, rq);
+
 	if (sync)
 		ioq->last_end_request = jiffies;
 
diff --git a/block/elevator-fq.h b/block/elevator-fq.h
index 3bea279..ce2d671 100644
--- a/block/elevator-fq.h
+++ b/block/elevator-fq.h
@@ -165,6 +165,9 @@ struct io_queue {
 	/* Requests dispatched from this queue */
 	int dispatched;
 
+	/* Number of sectors dispatched in current dispatch round */
+	int nr_sectors;
+
 	/* Keep a track of think time of processes in this queue */
 	unsigned long last_end_request;
 	unsigned long ttime_total;
@@ -223,6 +226,14 @@ struct elv_fq_data {
 	struct work_struct unplug_work;
 
 	unsigned int elv_slice[2];
+
+	/* Fields for keeping track of average disk rate */
+	unsigned long rate_sectors; /* number of sectors finished */
+	unsigned long rate_time;   /* jiffies elapsed */
+	unsigned long mean_rate; /* sectors per jiffy */
+	unsigned long long rate_sampling_start; /*sampling window start jifies*/
+	/* number of sectors finished io during current sampling window */
+	unsigned long rate_sectors_current;
 };
 
 extern int elv_slice_idle;
-- 
1.6.0.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-05-05 20:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 133+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-05 19:58 IO scheduler based IO Controller V2 Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 01/18] io-controller: Documentation Vivek Goyal
2009-05-06  3:16   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-06 13:31     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 02/18] io-controller: Common flat fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-05-22  6:43   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-22 12:32     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-23 20:04       ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-05 19:58 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 04/18] io-controller: Modify cfq to make use of flat elevator fair queuing Vivek Goyal
2009-05-22  8:54   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-22 12:33     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 05/18] io-controller: Common hierarchical fair queuing code in elevaotor layer Vivek Goyal
2009-05-07  7:42   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-07  8:05     ` Li Zefan
2009-05-08 12:45     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-08 21:09   ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-08 21:17     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 06/18] io-controller: cfq changes to use " Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 07/18] io-controller: Export disk time used and nr sectors dipatched through cgroups Vivek Goyal
2009-05-13  2:39   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-13 14:51     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-14  7:53       ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 08/18] io-controller: idle for sometime on sync queue before expiring it Vivek Goyal
2009-05-13 15:00   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-09  7:56   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-09 17:51     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-10  1:30       ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-06-10 13:26         ` Vivek Goyal
2009-06-11  1:22           ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 09/18] io-controller: Separate out queue and data Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 10/18] io-conroller: Prepare elevator layer for single queue schedulers Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 11/18] io-controller: noop changes for hierarchical fair queuing Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 12/18] io-controller: deadline " Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 13/18] io-controller: anticipatory " Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 14/18] blkio_cgroup patches from Ryo to track async bios Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 15/18] io-controller: map async requests to appropriate cgroup Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 16/18] io-controller: Per cgroup request descriptor support Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 17/18] io-controller: IO group refcounting support Vivek Goyal
2009-05-08  2:59   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-08 12:44     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-05 19:58 ` [PATCH 18/18] io-controller: Debug hierarchical IO scheduling Vivek Goyal
2009-05-06 21:40   ` IKEDA, Munehiro
2009-05-06 21:58     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-06 22:19       ` IKEDA, Munehiro
2009-05-06 22:24         ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-06 23:01           ` IKEDA, Munehiro
2009-05-05 20:24 ` IO scheduler based IO Controller V2 Andrew Morton
2009-05-05 22:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-06  3:42     ` Balbir Singh
2009-05-06 10:20       ` Fabio Checconi
2009-05-06 17:10         ` Balbir Singh
2009-05-06 18:47       ` Divyesh Shah
2009-05-06 20:42       ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-06  2:33   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-06 17:59     ` Nauman Rafique
2009-05-06 20:07     ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-06 21:21       ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-06 22:02         ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-06 22:17           ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-06 20:32     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-06 21:34       ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-06 21:52         ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-06 22:35           ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-07  1:48             ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-05-07  9:04           ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-07 12:22             ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-07 14:11             ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-07 14:45               ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-07 15:36                 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-07 15:42                   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-07 22:19                   ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-08 18:09                     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-08 20:05                       ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-08 21:56                         ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-09  9:22                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-14 10:31                           ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-14 16:43                           ` Dhaval Giani
2009-05-07 22:40                 ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-07  0:18     ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-05-07  1:25       ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-11 11:23         ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-05-11 12:49           ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-08 14:24       ` Rik van Riel
2009-05-11 10:11         ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-05-06  3:41   ` Balbir Singh
2009-05-06 13:28     ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-06  8:11 ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-06 16:10   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-07  5:36     ` Li Zefan
2009-05-08 13:37       ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-11  2:59         ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-07  5:47     ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-08  9:45 ` [PATCH] io-controller: Add io group reference handling for request Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-08 13:57   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-08 17:41     ` Nauman Rafique
2009-05-08 18:56       ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-08 19:06         ` Nauman Rafique
2009-05-11  1:33       ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-11 15:41         ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-15  5:15           ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-15  7:48             ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-15  8:16               ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-15 14:09                 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-15 14:06               ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-17 10:26                 ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-18 14:01                   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-18 14:39                     ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-26 11:34                       ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-05-27  6:56                         ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-05-27  8:17                           ` Andrea Righi
2009-05-27 11:53                             ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-05-27 17:32                           ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-19 12:18                     ` Ryo Tsuruta
2009-05-15  7:40           ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-15 14:01             ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-13  2:00 ` [PATCH] IO Controller: Add per-device weight and ioprio_class handling Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-13 14:44   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-14  0:59     ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-13 15:29   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-14  1:02     ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-13 15:59   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-14  1:51     ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-14  2:25     ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-13 17:17   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-14  1:24     ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-13 19:09   ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-14  1:35     ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-14  7:26     ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-14 15:15       ` Vivek Goyal
2009-05-18 22:33       ` IKEDA, Munehiro
2009-05-20  1:44         ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-05-20 15:41           ` IKEDA, Munehiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1241553525-28095-4-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=dpshah@google.com \
    --cc=fchecconi@gmail.com \
    --cc=fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=mikew@google.com \
    --cc=nauman@google.com \
    --cc=paolo.valente@unimore.it \
    --cc=righi.andrea@gmail.com \
    --cc=ryov@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).