From: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
lenb@kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.30-rc2 soft lockups: ACPI? clock source problem?
Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 21:58:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1241585888.8010.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1240513827.7224.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 12:10 -0700, john stultz wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 11:31 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 20:45 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > (Is jstultz@us.ibm.com correct?)
> >
> > Only I want it to go to the black hole which is Lotus Notes. :)
> >
> > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:30:38 -0700 Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> wrote:
> > > > This was during my first boot of 2.6.30-rc2.
> > >
> > > Did it ever happen again?
> >
> > I've seen it on three different boots, but the stack traces were a bit
> > different each time. So, I assume it is a true timekeeping thing
> > instead of something *actually* locking up.
> >
> > > I assume this is a post-2.6.29 regression? (Yet another. We've been
> > > extra bad this time)
> >
> > This laptop has been quite good to me and I haven't rebooted since the
> > late 2.6.28 days. It isn't anything special, though. Just a Lenovo
> > T61. I wonder if my .config is a bit different.
>
> I've got a T61 at home, so I'll try to test it out. Dave, can you send
> me your .config? Also any chance you can bisect this down a tiny bit?
OK, so I got back to this. It's actually fixed in -rc4! I assume it
was something in the ACPI merge that happened after -rc3.
I did check that the clocksource was set as the hpet in all cases both
before and after I saw the cpu lockup warning and on the good versions
of the kernel.
I can still go back and bisect it if anyone thinks that would be
valuable.
-- Dave
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-06 4:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-21 17:30 2.6.30-rc2 soft lockups: ACPI? clock source problem? Dave Hansen
2009-04-23 3:45 ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-23 18:31 ` Dave Hansen
2009-04-23 19:10 ` john stultz
2009-04-23 19:24 ` Dave Hansen
2009-04-23 19:35 ` Len Brown
2009-04-24 0:26 ` Dave Hansen
2009-05-06 4:58 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1241585888.8010.22.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox