Re: [PATCH] x86: Reduce the default HZ value

[Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>]

On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 08:14 -0700, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 7 May 2009 10:13:52 -0400 (EDT)
> Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> wrote:
> 
> > I think we need to reduce the general tick frequency to be as low as
> > possible. With high resolution timers the tick frequency is just the
> > frequency with which the timer interrupt disturbs a running application.
> > 
> > Are there any benefits remaining from frequent timer interrupts? I would
> > think that 60 HZ would be sufficient.
> 
> 50 works for various european video apps, 60 breaks, 60 works for various
> US video apps, 50 breaks. Now that may have changed with all the select
> stuff being hrtimer based (which I'd missed).

I would have assumed whatever timeout mechanism the video apps use
should have already been converted to hrtimers ? Or are you saying that
they use select stuff which is already hrtimer based and so there
shouldn't be any problem now for video apps ? 

> 
> The tick also still appears to be involved in ntp and in cpu stats where
> a 50Hz tick would mean only 25Hz accuracy on CPU usage etc
>