From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH -tip] x86: cpu/proc.c grouping of cpuid in /proc/cpuinfo
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 13:10:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1241941217.3200.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
Unification of cpuid_level.
Also added extended_cpuid_level to make it complete.
So cpuid* and cpufeature flag come in same group and /proc/cpuinfo
looks like on AMD box:
cpuid level : 1
ext cpuid level : 0x8000001a
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt rdtscp lm 3dnowext 3dnow constant_tsc rep_good nonstop_tsc pni cx16 lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy 3dnowprefetch osvw skinit
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c | 12 ++++++------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
index 523bf39..f63e968 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ static void show_cpuinfo_misc(struct seq_file *m, struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
"coma_bug\t: %s\n"
"fpu\t\t: %s\n"
"fpu_exception\t: %s\n"
- "cpuid level\t: %d\n"
"wp\t\t: %s\n",
c->fdiv_bug ? "yes" : "no",
c->hlt_works_ok ? "no" : "yes",
@@ -46,7 +45,6 @@ static void show_cpuinfo_misc(struct seq_file *m, struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
c->coma_bug ? "yes" : "no",
c->hard_math ? "yes" : "no",
fpu_exception ? "yes" : "no",
- c->cpuid_level,
c->wp_works_ok ? "yes" : "no");
}
#else
@@ -55,9 +53,7 @@ static void show_cpuinfo_misc(struct seq_file *m, struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
seq_printf(m,
"fpu\t\t: yes\n"
"fpu_exception\t: yes\n"
- "cpuid level\t: %d\n"
- "wp\t\t: yes\n",
- c->cpuid_level);
+ "wp\t\t: yes\n");
}
#endif
@@ -102,7 +98,11 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
show_cpuinfo_core(m, c, cpu);
show_cpuinfo_misc(m, c);
- seq_printf(m, "flags\t\t:");
+ seq_printf(m, "cpuid level\t: %d\n"
+ "ext cpuid level\t: 0x%x\n"
+ "flags\t\t:",
+ c->cpuid_level,
+ c->extended_cpuid_level);
for (i = 0; i < 32*NCAPINTS; i++)
if (cpu_has(c, i) && x86_cap_flags[i] != NULL)
seq_printf(m, " %s", x86_cap_flags[i]);
--
1.6.0.6
next reply other threads:[~2009-05-10 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-10 7:40 Jaswinder Singh Rajput [this message]
2009-05-11 4:18 ` [PATCH -tip] x86: cpu/proc.c grouping of cpuid in /proc/cpuinfo H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-11 6:27 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1241941217.3200.3.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox