From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@kernel.org>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/15 -tip] x86: Add cpufeatures for Advanced Power Management
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 06:01:04 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1242088264.2504.2.camel@ht.satnam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090511190910.GA28684@elte.hu>
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 21:09 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>
> > Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> >> 1. Add Advanced Power Management (Function 8000_0007h), edx
> >> 2. unification of X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC (from intel.c, amd.c to common.c)
> >> 3. Remove cpu/powerflags.c
> >> 4. Remove x86_power
> >> 5. Move 'power management' to flags of /proc/cpuinfo
> >>
> >> /proc/cpuinfo (before)
> >> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
> >> mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt
> >> rdtscp lm 3dnowext 3dnow constant_tsc rep_good nonstop_tsc pni cx16
> >> lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy 3dnowprefetch osvw skinit pname
> >> ..
> >> power management: ts ttp tm stc 100mhzsteps hwpstate
> >>
> >> /proc/cpuinfo (after)
> >> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
> >> mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt
> >> rdtscp lm 3dnowext 3dnow rep_good tsc_reliable nonstop_tsc pni cx16
> >> lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy 3dnowprefetch osvw skinit pname
> >> ts ttp htc stc 100mhzsteps hwpstate constant_tsc
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
> >
> > NAK in the extreme.
> >
> > This is an incompatible change to a userspace visible API. The
> > fact that power management flags were separate was braindamage in
> > the first place, of course, but we don't break established
> > userspace APIs even if they're stupid.
>
> Yes, and you pointed it out in an earlier reply.
>
> Jaswinder, as hpa said it before, we only ever extend cpuflags (i.e.
> add new ones mainly, and map new CPUs to the existing flags), but we
> dont change their semantics.
>
OK, then I will remove from this patch :
3. Remove cpu/powerflags.c
4. Remove x86_power
5. Move 'power management' to flags of /proc/cpuinfo
--
JSR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-12 0:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-11 16:14 [git-pull -tip] x86: Addition of cpufeatures to friendly access miscellaneous MSRs Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-05-11 16:29 ` Robert Richter
2009-05-11 16:41 ` [PATCH 1/15 -tip] x86: Add cpufeature for Processor Name Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-05-11 16:43 ` [PATCH 2/15 -tip] x86: Add cpufeatures for Advanced Power Management Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-05-11 16:44 ` [PATCH 3/15 -tip] x86: Add cpufeature for Microcode update Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-05-11 16:45 ` [PATCH 4/15 -tip] x86: Add cpufeature for Cache MSRs Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-05-11 16:48 ` [PATCH 5/15 -tip] x86: Add cpufeature for Hard and Soft Poweron configuration Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-05-11 16:49 ` [PATCH 6/15 -tip] x86: Add cpufeature for Scaleable bus speed Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-05-11 16:50 ` [PATCH 7/15 -tip] x86: Add cpufeature for Miscellaneous Features Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-05-11 16:50 ` [PATCH 8/15 -tip] x86: Add cpufeature for Platform feature Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-05-11 16:51 ` [PATCH 9/15 -tip] x86: Add cpufeature for Hardware configuration Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-05-11 16:52 ` [PATCH 10/15 -tip] x86: Add cpufeature for System configuration Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-05-11 16:52 ` [PATCH 11/15 -tip] x86: Add cpufeature for System management mode (SMM) Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-05-11 16:53 ` [PATCH 12/15 -tip] x86: Add cpufeature for MM configuration Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-05-11 16:54 ` [PATCH 13/15 -tip] x86: Add cpufeature for Bus configuration Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-05-11 16:55 ` [PATCH 14/15 -tip] x86: Add cpufeature for performance frequency APERF/MPERF Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-05-11 16:55 ` [PATCH 15/15 -tip] x86: Add cpufeature for ancient performance monitoring Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-05-11 18:13 ` [PATCH 2/15 -tip] x86: Add cpufeatures for Advanced Power Management H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-11 19:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-12 0:31 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput [this message]
2009-05-11 18:15 ` [git-pull -tip] x86: Addition of cpufeatures to friendly access miscellaneous MSRs H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-11 18:47 ` Robert Richter
2009-05-11 19:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-12 0:42 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-05-12 0:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1242088264.2504.2.camel@ht.satnam \
--to=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox