From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Jussi Laako <jussi@sonarnerd.net>
Cc: James Courtier-Dutton <James@superbug.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
d.faggioli@sssup.it
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Multimedia scheduling class, take 2
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 13:19:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1242127152.11251.335.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A094A44.30905@sonarnerd.net>
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 13:07 +0300, Jussi Laako wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > I certainly don't think the current situation is bad enough to warrant
> > things like that, media on my machines works peachy (*cheer* for XV on
> > R600).
>
> By the way, here's a good test case for a desktop, preferably UP:
> - run something like this in a loop:
> find / -type f -exec grep asd "{}" ";"
> - run x11perf * numcpus in a loop
> - run glxgears * numcpus
> - go to youtube frontpage with a web browser
> - start for example "totem" mediaplayer and play full-HD H.264 movie
>
> Does the movie playback and audio go smoothly? Can you play youtube HD
> videos smoothly?
I don't know about youtube, that flash thing doesn't seem to deliver
full hd content, and I'm not sure where to click, but playing a full-hd
trailer from the network using vlc seems to work just fine with 4
x11perf and 4 glxgears and that find thing.
There is an occasional stutter, but not much.
Thing is, adding static preemption priories into SCHED_OTHER (which is
basically what you propose I think) doesn't really help, I can still
load the machine high enough so that there simply isn't time available
to decode the frames while maintaining proportional fairness -- no
matter how preemptive you get.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-12 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-29 18:40 [RFC][PATCH] Multimedia scheduling class Jussi Laako
2008-12-30 7:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-30 8:39 ` Jussi Laako
2009-01-12 9:55 ` Jussi Laako
2009-01-12 10:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-13 9:44 ` Jussi Laako
2009-01-17 12:49 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2009-01-25 23:09 ` Jussi Laako
2009-01-26 7:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-11 8:22 ` [RFC][PATCH] Multimedia scheduling class, take 2 Jussi Laako
2009-05-12 5:38 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-05-12 5:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-12 9:53 ` Jussi Laako
2009-05-12 15:32 ` Chris Friesen
2009-05-12 16:34 ` Jussi Laako
2009-05-12 16:45 ` Raistlin
2009-05-12 17:38 ` Jussi Laako
2009-05-12 17:55 ` Jussi Laako
2009-05-12 17:00 ` Chris Friesen
2009-05-12 17:53 ` Jussi Laako
2009-05-12 23:04 ` Chris Friesen
2009-05-13 6:36 ` Jussi Laako
2009-05-12 10:07 ` Jussi Laako
2009-05-12 11:19 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-05-12 12:12 ` Jussi Laako
2009-05-12 9:40 ` Henrik Austad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1242127152.11251.335.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=James@superbug.co.uk \
--cc=d.faggioli@sssup.it \
--cc=jussi@sonarnerd.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox