Re: [PATCH 3/10 -tip] x86: Add cpufeatures for Advanced Power Management

[Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>]

On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 23:04 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Jaswinder,
> 
> On Wed, 13 May 2009, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > +	/* Advanced Power Management (Function 8000_0007h), edx */
> > +	if (c->extended_cpuid_level >= 0x80000007) {
> > +		c->x86_capability[9] = cpuid_edx(0x80000007);
> 
> In the reply to [Patch 5/10] Ingo wrote:
> >> Also, open-coding x86_capability[9] like that is quite unclean. Were 
> >> we ever to reorder those bits internally, this could would break.
> 
> Do you really believe that open-coding x86_capability[9] in .../common.c
> is better than the open-coding in ../powernow-k8.c ?
> 
> Again, open-coding is wrong and error prone. Ingo explicitely asked for a
> helper function. All you did is moving the open-coded hard wired array
> reference to a different place.
> 
> Please start to listen to the review comments as long as people are
> willing to look at your patches. Seriously, the noise/useful ratio of
> your patches is annoying and adds an unjustified burden to the
> maintainers of that code.
> 

Ok, trashed complete cpu_debug and cpufeature patches, I hope it will
makes maintainers happy and save their precious time.

Anyway thanks for being so helpful and making my task easier :-)

--
JSR