From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1758782AbZEMNsR@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1758782AbZEMNsR (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 13 May 2009 09:48:17 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752139AbZEMNr6
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 13 May 2009 09:47:58 -0400
Received: from viefep19-int.chello.at ([62.179.121.39]:64374 "EHLO
	viefep19-int.chello.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751032AbZEMNr5 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 13 May 2009 09:47:57 -0400
X-SourceIP: 213.93.53.227
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Saving power by cpu
 evacuationsched_max_capacity_pct=n
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
       Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
       Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
       Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>, Vatsa <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
       Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
       Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@gmail.com>,
       Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
       Arun Bharadwaj <arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090513134556.GN13394@balbir.in.ibm.com>
References: <20090513130541.21440.33364.stgit@drishya.in.ibm.com>
	 <1242220497.26820.21.camel@twins>
	 <20090513134556.GN13394@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 15:47:55 +0200
Message-Id: <1242222475.26820.22.camel@twins>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 19:15 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> [2009-05-13 15:14:57]:
> 
> > On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 18:41 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
> > 
> > > * Peter Zijlstra wanted more justifications for throttling at the core
> > >   level.  Throttling may be a resource management problem rather than
> > >   scheduler/load balancer
> > 
> > No, I mandate that it be thermal management. Any other reason and you've
> > got a NAK.
> 
> We've been discussing hard limits from the resource management view
> point. Bharata is working on a RFC that we should be able to share
> soon

Right, and you well know I dislike them.