From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758106AbZEQD5e (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 May 2009 23:57:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754605AbZEQD5Z (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 May 2009 23:57:25 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:43574 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754284AbZEQD5Z (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 May 2009 23:57:25 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC] TuxOnIce From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Nigel Cunningham Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tuxonice-devel@lists.tuxonice.net In-Reply-To: <1241620755-22133-1-git-send-email-nigel@tuxonice.net> References: <1241620755-22133-1-git-send-email-nigel@tuxonice.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 13:57:13 +1000 Message-Id: <1242532633.9691.11.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 00:38 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > I'd like to submit TuxOnIce for review, with a view to seeking to get it > merged, perhaps in 2.6.31 or .32 (depending upon what needs work before > it can be merged) and the willingness of those who matter. Might have been nicer if your RFC message actually quickly described what TuxOnIce actually is :-) Cheers, Ben.