From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755888AbZEQKjJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2009 06:39:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753875AbZEQKiy (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2009 06:38:54 -0400 Received: from mk-filter-2-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.100.53]:45355 "EHLO mk-filter-2-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753253AbZEQKix (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2009 06:38:53 -0400 X-Trace: 200042701/mk-filter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$b2c-THROTTLED-DYNAMIC/b2c-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP/80.41.64.35/None/adrian@newgolddream.dyndns.info X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 80.41.64.35 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: adrian@newgolddream.dyndns.info X-SMTP-AUTH: X-MUA: Evolution 2.26.1 X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8IACOGD0pQKUAj/2dsb2JhbACBToEwzFGCQoE/BQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.41,207,1241391600"; d="scan'208";a="200042701" Subject: Re: [Bug #13069] regression in 2.6.29-git3 on SH/Dreamcast From: Adrian McMenamin To: Pekka Enberg Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Manuel Lauss In-Reply-To: <84144f020905170112l789e9ec0p2bf6bb71879579e1@mail.gmail.com> References: <1240594638.4777.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <84144f020905170112l789e9ec0p2bf6bb71879579e1@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 11:38:35 +0100 Message-Id: <1242556715.4568.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 11:12 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 23:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > >> of recent regressions. > >> > >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > >> from 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > >> (either way). > >> > >> > >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13069 > >> Subject : regression in 2.6.29-git3 on SH/Dreamcast > >> Submitter : Adrian McMenamin > >> Date : 2009-03-29 19:04 (19 days old) > >> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123835353115372&w=4 > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Adrian McMenamin > wrote: > > At this point it *looks* as though it was simply a question of > > insufficient memory to boot, but I think it needs further testing. > > Nobody else seems to have picked it up though. > > Yeah, it looks like there's not enough memory to boot. It could well > be that the kernel memory footprint got bigger but I don't think the > bisected commit is at fault here. Perhaps we should just close the > bug? I think that is probably the best course of action for now, yes.