linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
To: ian.campbell@citrix.com
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	Becky Bruce <beckyb@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
	xen-devel <xendevel@lists.xensource.com>,
	x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] swiotlb/xen: update xen swiotlb for phys<->bus API changes
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 17:15:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1242922528-5982-8-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1242906335.22654.188.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>

These functions are now implemented via explicit hooks in
arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c rather than as weak hooks in swiotlb.c

Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Becky Bruce <beckyb@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: xen-devel <xendevel@lists.xensource.com>
Cc: x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pci/xen-iommu.c |    6 ++++--
 include/xen/swiotlb.h   |    3 ---
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/xen-iommu.c b/drivers/pci/xen-iommu.c
index 2d727d1..02de48a 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/xen-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/xen-iommu.c
@@ -72,12 +72,12 @@ int xen_wants_swiotlb(void)
 	return xen_initial_domain();
 }
 
-dma_addr_t xen_phys_to_bus(phys_addr_t paddr)
+static dma_addr_t xen_phys_to_bus(struct device *hwdev, phys_addr_t paddr)
 {
 	return phys_to_machine(XPADDR(paddr)).maddr;
 }
 
-phys_addr_t xen_bus_to_phys(dma_addr_t daddr)
+static phys_addr_t xen_bus_to_phys(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t daddr)
 {
 	return machine_to_phys(XMADDR(daddr)).paddr;
 }
@@ -322,6 +322,8 @@ void __init detect_xen_iommu(void)
 
 	x86_swiotlb_force_mapping = &xen_swiotlb_force_mapping;
 	x86_swiotlb_alloc_fixup = &xen_swiotlb_alloc_fixup;
+	x86_bus_to_phys = &xen_bus_to_phys;
+	x86_phys_to_bus = &xen_phys_to_bus;
 }
 
 void __init xen_iommu_init(void)
diff --git a/include/xen/swiotlb.h b/include/xen/swiotlb.h
index 83ec002..e6c7707 100644
--- a/include/xen/swiotlb.h
+++ b/include/xen/swiotlb.h
@@ -1,9 +1,6 @@
 #ifndef _XEN_SWIOTLB_H
 #define _XEN_SWIOTLB_H
 
-extern phys_addr_t xen_bus_to_phys(dma_addr_t daddr);
-extern dma_addr_t xen_phys_to_bus(phys_addr_t paddr);
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_XEN
 extern int xen_wants_swiotlb(void);
 #else
-- 
1.5.6.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-05-21 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-14 19:54 Where do we stand with the Xen patches? Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-15 18:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-15 19:59   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-18  1:36 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-18  1:42   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-18  8:40   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-19  5:27     ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-19 13:03       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-19 15:30         ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-19 15:56           ` Ian Campbell
2009-05-20 17:06             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-05-21  8:54               ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-21 10:27                 ` Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 10:28                   ` Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 10:39                     ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-21 11:03                       ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 11:08                         ` Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 11:19                         ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-21 11:45                           ` Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 16:15                             ` swiotlb: remove __weak hooks in favour of architecture-specific functions Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 16:19                               ` Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 16:47                               ` Randy Dunlap
2009-05-22  8:55                                 ` Ian Campbell
2009-05-22 11:13                               ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-22 11:43                                 ` Ian Campbell
2009-05-22 11:55                                   ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-22 14:02                                     ` Ian Campbell
2009-05-22 14:24                                       ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-21 16:15                             ` [PATCH] swiotlb: make is_buffer_dma_capable architecture-specific Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 16:15                             ` [PATCH] swiotlb: make range_needs_mapping architecture-specific Ian Campbell
2009-05-22 11:13                               ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-22 11:45                                 ` Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 16:15                             ` [PATCH] swiotlb/xen: update xen for swiotlb_arch_force_mapping changes Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 16:15                             ` [PATCH] swiotlb: make swiotlb allocation functions architecture-specific Ian Campbell
2009-05-22 11:13                               ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-22 11:46                                 ` Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 16:15                             ` [PATCH] swiotlb/xen: update xen for changes to swiotlb allocation interface Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 16:15                             ` [PATCH] swiotlb: make swiotlb phys<->bus translations architecture-specific Ian Campbell
2009-05-22 11:13                               ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-22 11:46                                 ` Ian Campbell
2009-05-21 16:15                             ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2009-05-21 17:21                             ` [Xen-devel] Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches? FUJITA Tomonori
2009-05-21 10:48                 ` Ian Campbell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1242922528-5982-8-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=beckyb@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=okir@suse.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xendevel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).