From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
shaohua.li@intel.com, svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] x86: Add pm_play_dead funcptr to power-efficiently offline CPUs
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 12:44:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1243075498.6582.1049.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090522232230.020301000@intel.com>
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 16:19 -0700, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com wrote:
> plain text document attachment
> (0001-x86-Add-pm_play_dead-funcptr-to-power-efficiently-o.patch)
> Add a funcptr pm_play_dead (similar to pm_idle) that can take
> the offline CPUs to the most power efficient idle state.
>
> This patch just adds the func pointer. The pointer will get initialized
> by patch that follows.
Since the pm_idle function pointer has given us so much grief, I don't
think its wise to repeat that particular disaster.
I'd much rather see a framework where idle functions can be registered,
and selected from based on criteria such as wakeup latency as provided
by the pm_qos stuff, and power saving.
This framework should be shared between hotplug-idle and the regular
idle routines. Hotplug would of course not care about things like wakeup
latency and might therefore pick another idle routine.
> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h | 2 ++
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 7 ++++++-
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
> index 19e0d88..0388b81 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
> @@ -148,6 +148,8 @@ static inline int num_booting_cpus(void)
> {
> return cpumask_weight(cpu_callout_mask);
> }
> +
> +extern void (*pm_play_dead)(void);
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
> extern unsigned disabled_cpus __cpuinitdata;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> index 58d24ef..4f8af6a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -1195,6 +1195,8 @@ __init void prefill_possible_map(void)
> nr_cpu_ids = possible;
> }
>
> +void (*pm_play_dead)(void) = NULL;
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>
> static void remove_siblinginfo(int cpu)
> @@ -1313,7 +1315,10 @@ void play_dead_common(void)
> void native_play_dead(void)
> {
> play_dead_common();
> - wbinvd_halt();
> + if (pm_play_dead)
> + pm_play_dead();
> + else
> + wbinvd_halt();
> }
>
> #else /* ... !CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
> --
> 1.6.0.6
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-23 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-22 23:19 [patch 0/2] x86: Make offline cpus to go to deepest idle state using mwait venkatesh.pallipadi
2009-05-22 23:19 ` [patch 1/2] x86: Add pm_play_dead funcptr to power-efficiently offline CPUs venkatesh.pallipadi
2009-05-23 10:44 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-05-23 15:07 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-06-22 17:25 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-05-22 23:19 ` [patch 2/2] x86: put offline CPUs into deepest mwait cstate_subcstate venkatesh.pallipadi
2009-05-25 0:56 ` Shaohua Li
2009-05-26 21:17 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2010-09-17 23:46 ` [tip:x86/idle] x86, hotplug: Use mwait to offline a processor, fix the legacy case tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2010-09-18 0:13 ` [tip:x86/idle] x86, hotplug: Move WBINVD back outside the play_dead loop tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2010-09-18 0:48 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-09-20 18:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-09-20 20:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-09-20 22:34 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1243075498.6582.1049.camel@laptop \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox