public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Smith <paul@mad-scientist.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.27.24] Kernel coredump to a pipe is failing
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 12:33:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1243355634.29250.331.camel@psmith-ubeta.netezza.com> (raw)

Sorry for not following up to my previous message to get the threading
headers correct: the original is on another system I don't have access
to and I can't find a way to reply from any of the web archived
versions.  Anyway, this is a link to the original FYI:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124299629611706

In that post I observed that my short cores were being caused by
dump_write() returning 0; taking another look at dump_write():

        static int dump_write(struct file *file, const void *addr, int nr)
        {
        	return file->f_op->write(file, addr, nr, &file->f_pos) == nr;
        }

If the write operation returns an error of any kind, or it fails to
write the complete set of bytes (nr here is always PAGE_SIZE, as this
function is called when it fails), then dump_write() returns 0 and we
get a short core.

So I annotated dump_write() to printk() if this operation is false, and
I get:

        file ffff8803b95d0180: dump_write: -512 < 4096

Well, -512 is ERESTARTSYS.  That, to me, seems like a reasonable error
code to get when we're trying to dump core to a pipe.  Yes?  No?

Shouldn't we be doing some kind of error handling here, at least for
basic things like signals?  Should a process that's dumping core be set
to ignore signals?  Should dump_write() try again on ERESTARTSYS?

Any advice or comments would be greatly appreciated!



             reply	other threads:[~2009-05-26 16:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-26 16:33 Paul Smith [this message]
2009-05-26 18:01 ` [2.6.27.24] Kernel coredump to a pipe is failing Paul Smith
2009-05-26 20:31 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-26 21:09   ` Paul Smith
2009-05-26 23:00   ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-26 23:14     ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-26 23:28       ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-26 23:41         ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-26 23:45           ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-27  0:11             ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-27  0:29               ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-27  6:02                 ` Paul Smith
2009-05-27  6:17                 ` Paul Smith
2009-05-27  7:31                 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-27  7:45                   ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-27  8:52                     ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-27  8:56                       ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-27 20:25           ` Jesper Juhl
2009-05-29 10:34           ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-27 18:31   ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-27 18:50     ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-27 19:05       ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-27 19:49         ` Paul Smith
2009-05-27 20:34           ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-27 20:04     ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-27 20:22       ` Paul Smith
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-22 12:34 Paul Smith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1243355634.29250.331.camel@psmith-ubeta.netezza.com \
    --to=paul@mad-scientist.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox