From: Paul Smith <paul@mad-scientist.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.27.24] Kernel coredump to a pipe is failing
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 12:33:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1243355634.29250.331.camel@psmith-ubeta.netezza.com> (raw)
Sorry for not following up to my previous message to get the threading
headers correct: the original is on another system I don't have access
to and I can't find a way to reply from any of the web archived
versions. Anyway, this is a link to the original FYI:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124299629611706
In that post I observed that my short cores were being caused by
dump_write() returning 0; taking another look at dump_write():
static int dump_write(struct file *file, const void *addr, int nr)
{
return file->f_op->write(file, addr, nr, &file->f_pos) == nr;
}
If the write operation returns an error of any kind, or it fails to
write the complete set of bytes (nr here is always PAGE_SIZE, as this
function is called when it fails), then dump_write() returns 0 and we
get a short core.
So I annotated dump_write() to printk() if this operation is false, and
I get:
file ffff8803b95d0180: dump_write: -512 < 4096
Well, -512 is ERESTARTSYS. That, to me, seems like a reasonable error
code to get when we're trying to dump core to a pipe. Yes? No?
Shouldn't we be doing some kind of error handling here, at least for
basic things like signals? Should a process that's dumping core be set
to ignore signals? Should dump_write() try again on ERESTARTSYS?
Any advice or comments would be greatly appreciated!
next reply other threads:[~2009-05-26 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-26 16:33 Paul Smith [this message]
2009-05-26 18:01 ` [2.6.27.24] Kernel coredump to a pipe is failing Paul Smith
2009-05-26 20:31 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-26 21:09 ` Paul Smith
2009-05-26 23:00 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-26 23:14 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-26 23:28 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-26 23:41 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-26 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-27 0:11 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-27 0:29 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-27 6:02 ` Paul Smith
2009-05-27 6:17 ` Paul Smith
2009-05-27 7:31 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-27 7:45 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-27 8:52 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-27 8:56 ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-27 20:25 ` Jesper Juhl
2009-05-29 10:34 ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-27 18:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-27 18:50 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-27 19:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-27 19:49 ` Paul Smith
2009-05-27 20:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-27 20:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-27 20:22 ` Paul Smith
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-22 12:34 Paul Smith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1243355634.29250.331.camel@psmith-ubeta.netezza.com \
--to=paul@mad-scientist.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox