From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757687AbZEZU0q (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2009 16:26:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753460AbZEZU0j (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2009 16:26:39 -0400 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.152]:51192 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751229AbZEZU0i (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2009 16:26:38 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Dynamic Tick: Allow 32-bit machines to sleep formorethan2.15 seconds From: john stultz To: Jon Hunter Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: <4A1C06D7.8080000@ti.com> References: <49ECE615.2010800@ti.com> <20090421063523.GA8020@elte.hu> <1240345936.6080.6.camel@localhost> <49EE54B4.9020700@ti.com> <1240358525.6080.40.camel@localhost> <4A02F5A3.3050004@ti.com> <1241744048.7518.132.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4A04584E.4020307@ti.com> <1241830281.7297.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4A0A07D6.90408@ti.com> <1242172727.3462.55.camel@localhost> <4A0AE3E3.5090304@ti.com> <1242232872.9110.98.camel@jstultz-laptop> <4A0B0939.5030008@ti.com> <1242242497.9777.2.camel@jstultz-laptop> <4A0D99E0.3050306@ti.com> <1242436726.29511.198.camel@jstultz-laptop> <4A16ED34.9060808@ti.com> <1243020192.7480.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4A1C06D7.8080000@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 13:26:37 -0700 Message-Id: <1243369597.3275.8.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 10:12 -0500, Jon Hunter wrote: > Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Fri, 22 May 2009, john stultz wrote: > >> Acked-by: John Stultz > >> > >> This looks great to me! > >> > >> Thanks for putting up with my nit-picky review and revised suggestions! > >> > >> Thomas, you ok to pick this up? > > > > Yup, will do. > > Hi Thomas, John, > > Would you also be willing to accept the initial patch that I submitted? > > See: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124026224019895&w=2 > > If so, I could resubmit the two patches as a patch series called > something like "dynamic tick: enabling longer sleep times on 32-bit > machines." > > Let me know your thoughts. I will also also add a changelog too. Yea, I think both of them look good. So I'd resend as a patch set with proper patch descriptions on both. thanks -john