* [PATCH] TXx9: Add TX4939 RNG support
@ 2009-05-26 15:02 Atsushi Nemoto
[not found] ` <1243642882.8020.9.camel@calx>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Atsushi Nemoto @ 2009-05-26 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mips; +Cc: ralf, linux-kernel
Add platform support for RNG of TX4939 SoC.
Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
---
arch/mips/include/asm/txx9/tx4939.h | 1 +
arch/mips/txx9/generic/setup_tx4939.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
arch/mips/txx9/rbtx4939/setup.c | 1 +
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/txx9/tx4939.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/txx9/tx4939.h
index 050364d..3451499 100644
--- a/arch/mips/include/asm/txx9/tx4939.h
+++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/txx9/tx4939.h
@@ -547,5 +547,6 @@ void tx4939_ndfmc_init(unsigned int hold, unsigned int spw,
void tx4939_dmac_init(int memcpy_chan0, int memcpy_chan1);
void tx4939_aclc_init(void);
void tx4939_sramc_init(void);
+void tx4939_rng_init(void);
#endif /* __ASM_TXX9_TX4939_H */
diff --git a/arch/mips/txx9/generic/setup_tx4939.c b/arch/mips/txx9/generic/setup_tx4939.c
index df13a89..4b7293c 100644
--- a/arch/mips/txx9/generic/setup_tx4939.c
+++ b/arch/mips/txx9/generic/setup_tx4939.c
@@ -500,6 +500,24 @@ void __init tx4939_sramc_init(void)
txx9_sramc_init(&tx4939_sram_resource);
}
+#define TX4939_RNG_REG ((TX4939_CRYPTO_REG & 0xfffffffffULL) + 0xb0)
+void __init tx4939_rng_init(void)
+{
+ static struct resource res = {
+ .start = TX4939_RNG_REG,
+ .end = TX4939_RNG_REG + 0x30 - 1,
+ .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
+ };
+ static struct platform_device pdev = {
+ .name = "tx4939-rng",
+ .id = -1,
+ .num_resources = 1,
+ .resource = &res,
+ };
+
+ platform_device_register(&pdev);
+}
+
static void __init tx4939_stop_unused_modules(void)
{
__u64 pcfg, rst = 0, ckd = 0;
diff --git a/arch/mips/txx9/rbtx4939/setup.c b/arch/mips/txx9/rbtx4939/setup.c
index b919696..c033ffe 100644
--- a/arch/mips/txx9/rbtx4939/setup.c
+++ b/arch/mips/txx9/rbtx4939/setup.c
@@ -502,6 +502,7 @@ static void __init rbtx4939_device_init(void)
tx4939_aclc_init();
platform_device_register_simple("txx9aclc-generic", -1, NULL, 0);
tx4939_sramc_init();
+ tx4939_rng_init();
}
static void __init rbtx4939_setup(void)
--
1.5.6.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] TXx9: Add TX4939 RNG support
[not found] ` <1243642882.8020.9.camel@calx>
@ 2009-05-31 16:57 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2009-05-31 17:01 ` Matt Mackall
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Atsushi Nemoto @ 2009-05-31 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpm; +Cc: linux-mips, ralf, linux-kernel, herbert
: This is a reply for comments from Matt Mackall via mm-commit mail.
On Fri, 29 May 2009 19:21:22 -0500, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> wrote:
> > +++ a/arch/mips/txx9/generic/setup_tx4939.c
> > @@ -494,6 +494,24 @@ void __init tx4939_aclc_init(void)
> > TXX9_IRQ_BASE + TX4939_IR_ACLC, 1, 0, 1);
> > }
> >
> > +#define TX4939_RNG_REG ((TX4939_CRYPTO_REG & 0xfffffffffULL) + 0xb0)
>
> This isn't the best place for this define?
Well, I can move it to include/asm/txx9/tx4939.h.
> > +++ a/arch/mips/txx9/rbtx4939/setup.c
> > @@ -501,6 +501,7 @@ static void __init rbtx4939_device_init(
> > tx4939_dmac_init(0, 2);
> > tx4939_aclc_init();
> > platform_device_register_simple("txx9aclc-generic", -1, NULL, 0);
> > + tx4939_rng_init();
> > }
> >
> > static void __init rbtx4939_setup(void)
>
> Not clear to me how this works when this is a module?
This patch add a registration of a platform device for RNG to vmlinux.
And the other patch add a driver module for the RNG. This strategy is
fairly common for SoCs or embedded platforms.
---
Atsushi Nemoto
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] TXx9: Add TX4939 RNG support
2009-05-31 16:57 ` Atsushi Nemoto
@ 2009-05-31 17:01 ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-31 17:23 ` Atsushi Nemoto
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Matt Mackall @ 2009-05-31 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Atsushi Nemoto; +Cc: linux-mips, ralf, linux-kernel, herbert
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 01:57 +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
> : This is a reply for comments from Matt Mackall via mm-commit mail.
>
> On Fri, 29 May 2009 19:21:22 -0500, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> wrote:
> > > +++ a/arch/mips/txx9/generic/setup_tx4939.c
> > > @@ -494,6 +494,24 @@ void __init tx4939_aclc_init(void)
> > > TXX9_IRQ_BASE + TX4939_IR_ACLC, 1, 0, 1);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +#define TX4939_RNG_REG ((TX4939_CRYPTO_REG & 0xfffffffffULL) + 0xb0)
> >
> > This isn't the best place for this define?
>
> Well, I can move it to include/asm/txx9/tx4939.h.
>
> > > +++ a/arch/mips/txx9/rbtx4939/setup.c
> > > @@ -501,6 +501,7 @@ static void __init rbtx4939_device_init(
> > > tx4939_dmac_init(0, 2);
> > > tx4939_aclc_init();
> > > platform_device_register_simple("txx9aclc-generic", -1, NULL, 0);
> > > + tx4939_rng_init();
> > > }
> > >
> > > static void __init rbtx4939_setup(void)
> >
> > Not clear to me how this works when this is a module?
>
> This patch add a registration of a platform device for RNG to vmlinux.
> And the other patch add a driver module for the RNG. This strategy is
> fairly common for SoCs or embedded platforms.
If your driver is built as a module (which your patch allows), the above
won't work, right?
--
http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] TXx9: Add TX4939 RNG support
2009-05-31 17:01 ` Matt Mackall
@ 2009-05-31 17:23 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2009-05-31 17:32 ` Matt Mackall
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Atsushi Nemoto @ 2009-05-31 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpm; +Cc: linux-mips, ralf, linux-kernel, herbert
On Sun, 31 May 2009 12:01:29 -0500, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> wrote:
> > > Not clear to me how this works when this is a module?
> >
> > This patch add a registration of a platform device for RNG to vmlinux.
> > And the other patch add a driver module for the RNG. This strategy is
> > fairly common for SoCs or embedded platforms.
>
> If your driver is built as a module (which your patch allows), the above
> won't work, right?
No, the rng driver can be used regardless of module or built-in, as
like as other platform drivers. Any special issue for hw_rng?
---
Atsushi Nemoto
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] TXx9: Add TX4939 RNG support
2009-05-31 17:23 ` Atsushi Nemoto
@ 2009-05-31 17:32 ` Matt Mackall
2009-06-02 14:13 ` Atsushi Nemoto
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Matt Mackall @ 2009-05-31 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Atsushi Nemoto; +Cc: linux-mips, ralf, linux-kernel, herbert
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 02:23 +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
> On Sun, 31 May 2009 12:01:29 -0500, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> wrote:
> > > > Not clear to me how this works when this is a module?
> > >
> > > This patch add a registration of a platform device for RNG to vmlinux.
> > > And the other patch add a driver module for the RNG. This strategy is
> > > fairly common for SoCs or embedded platforms.
> >
> > If your driver is built as a module (which your patch allows), the above
> > won't work, right?
>
> No, the rng driver can be used regardless of module or built-in, as
> like as other platform drivers. Any special issue for hw_rng?
I found the source of my confusion: you've given the init function in
both files exactly the same name. So when I saw .._init at the bottom of
the second patch, I assumed it was referring to the possibly not loaded
driver's init code.
--
http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] TXx9: Add TX4939 RNG support
2009-05-31 17:32 ` Matt Mackall
@ 2009-06-02 14:13 ` Atsushi Nemoto
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Atsushi Nemoto @ 2009-06-02 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpm; +Cc: linux-mips, ralf, linux-kernel, herbert
On Sun, 31 May 2009 12:32:50 -0500, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> wrote:
> > No, the rng driver can be used regardless of module or built-in, as
> > like as other platform drivers. Any special issue for hw_rng?
>
> I found the source of my confusion: you've given the init function in
> both files exactly the same name. So when I saw .._init at the bottom of
> the second patch, I assumed it was referring to the possibly not loaded
> driver's init code.
OK, I see. I will rename one of them to avoid such a confusion.
Thanks.
---
Atsushi Nemoto
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-02 14:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-05-26 15:02 [PATCH] TXx9: Add TX4939 RNG support Atsushi Nemoto
[not found] ` <1243642882.8020.9.camel@calx>
2009-05-31 16:57 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2009-05-31 17:01 ` Matt Mackall
2009-05-31 17:23 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2009-05-31 17:32 ` Matt Mackall
2009-06-02 14:13 ` Atsushi Nemoto
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox