From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754619AbZFACKx (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 May 2009 22:10:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753804AbZFACKq (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 May 2009 22:10:46 -0400 Received: from dallas.jonmasters.org ([72.29.103.172]:48076 "EHLO dallas.jonmasters.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753323AbZFACKp (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 May 2009 22:10:45 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/17] xen: disable MSI From: Jon Masters To: Roland Dreier Cc: Andrew Morton , Alan Cox , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , the arch/x86 maintainers , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Xen-devel , Greg KH , Jens Axboe , Chris Wright , kurt.hackel@oracle.com, Ky Srinivasan , Beulich , Avi Kivity , Jeremy Fitzhardinge In-Reply-To: References: <1243409850-21577-1-git-send-email-jeremy@goop.org> <1243409850-21577-18-git-send-email-jeremy@goop.org> <20090527211828.GA6166@elte.hu> <20090528072844.4c1db656@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20090527233807.e7e39e97.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: World Organi[sz]ation Of Broken Dreams Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 22:09:50 -0400 Message-Id: <1243822190.14346.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 (2.24.5-1.fc10) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Do-Not-Run: Yes X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jonathan@jonmasters.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on dallas.jonmasters.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 15:21 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > > Yup. I presently use "Addresses: " in the changelog. > > > > y:/usr/src/git26> git-log | grep '^ Addresses.*bugzilla' | wc -l > > 36 > > > > Formalising that a bit more would be good. > > > > Not all patches literally "close" a bugzilla report though. Sometimes > > there's related info in bugzilla but the bug remains. But > > "closes-bug:" is close enough. > > Yes, I deliberately didn't suggest "Fixes-bug:" but I like your > "Addresses:" language even better. I'll start using that for any > commits from now on. We use "Resolves" and "Related" within Red Hat and Fedora in describing bugs. I might recommend "Related" as it's already used by a few groups here, although it's simply another way of saying the same. Jon.