public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] headers_check fix: arm, hwcap.h
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 15:04:12 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1244280852.2475.46.camel@ht.satnam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090606091215.GB30463@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 10:12 +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 02:20:11PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > 
> > The problem is why you are trying to complex things which are simple and
> > straight.
> 
> What you're saying is "you may not follow valid C ways of expressing
> conditional compilation" to which I say "go and piss in someone elses
> pool".
> 

Hmm, again you are trying to complex things.

Issue is not of valid C or not.

Issue is #if defined(__KERNEL__) && (<unknown>) is WRONG.

It should be :

#ifdef __KERNEL__
#ifdef <unknown>

otherwise how you will pass it to userspace.

Why you are looking on kernel side only why do not you think about user
space ?
please check how it will look at usr/include/asm-arm/hwcap.h

> Since the fix for this in unifdef is soo trivial, and it doesn't require
> people to write stuff in ways that stupid idiotic tools can understand,
> I'm NEVER going to apply the fix to hwdef.h.
> 
> So you now have two options: either supply the (correct) additional
> parameter to unifdef, or ignore the stupid idiotic warning message.
> 

I will go with 3rd option.

Thanks,
--
JSR


  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-06  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-04 12:23 [PATCH 0/6] headers_check fix patches 20090604 Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 12:27 ` [PATCH 1/6] headers_check fix: arm, hwcap.h Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 12:29   ` [PATCH 2/6] headers_check fix: ia64, fpswa.h Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 12:31     ` [PATCH 3/6] headers_check fix: m68k, swab.h Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 12:35       ` [PATCH 4/6] headers_check fix: mips, ioctl.h Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 12:37         ` [PATCH 5/6] headers_check fix: mn10300, ptrace.h Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 12:38           ` [PATCH 6/6] headers_check fix: mn10300, setup.h Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 12:46         ` [PATCH 4/6] headers_check fix: mips, ioctl.h Ralf Baechle
2009-06-04 20:09           ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-05  9:34             ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-05 12:04               ` Ralf Baechle
2009-06-04 20:22     ` [PATCH 2/6] headers_check fix: ia64, fpswa.h Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-08 16:33       ` Luck, Tony
2009-06-08 17:48         ` [PATCH] ia64: unexport fpswa.h Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-05  9:26     ` [PATCH 2/6] headers_check fix: ia64, fpswa.h Arnd Bergmann
2009-06-04 12:53   ` [PATCH 1/6] headers_check fix: arm, hwcap.h Russell King
2009-06-04 15:45     ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-04 20:16     ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-05 20:10       ` Russell King
2009-06-05 20:17         ` Robert P. J. Day
2009-06-05 20:48       ` Russell King
2009-06-05 21:24         ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-06  8:50         ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-06  9:12           ` Russell King
2009-06-06  9:34             ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput [this message]
2009-06-04 20:12 ` [PATCH 0/6] headers_check fix patches 20090604 Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-05  2:00   ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-06  8:10 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-06  8:43   ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-06  9:09     ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-06 12:54 ` [GIT PULL] headers_check fixes Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-06 13:02   ` Russell King
2009-06-06 13:34     ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-06 13:41       ` Russell King
2009-06-06 14:39     ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-06 21:47       ` Russell King
2009-06-06 21:51         ` Russell King
2009-06-06 22:12         ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-06 23:24           ` Russell King
2009-06-07  7:09             ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-07  7:16         ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-06-07 10:15         ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1244280852.2475.46.camel@ht.satnam \
    --to=jaswinder@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox