From: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
To: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: Bug: fio traps into kernel without exiting because futex has a deadloop
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:05:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1244700331.2560.271.camel@ymzhang> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A309D16.4040505@us.ibm.com>
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 22:58 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
>
> Hi Zhang,
>
> > I investigate a fio hang issue. When I run fio multi-process
> > testing on many disks, fio traps into kernel and doesn't exit
> > (mostly hit once after runing sub test cases for hundreds of times).
> >
> > Oprofile data shows kernel consumes time with some futex functions.
> > Command kill couldn't kill the process and machine reboot also hangs.
> >
> > Eventually, I locate the root cause as a bug of futex. Kernel enters
> > a deadloop between 'retry' and 'goto retry' in function futex_wake_op.
> > By unknown reason (might be an issue of fio or glibc), parameter uaddr2
> > points to an area which is READONLY. So futex_atomic_op_inuser returns
> > -EFAULT when trying to changing the data at uaddr2, but later get_user
> > still succeeds becasue the area is READONLY. Then go back to retry.
> >
> > I create a simple test case to trigger it, which just shmat an READONLY
> > area for address uaddr2.
> >
> > It could be used as a DOS attack.
>
> Nice work on the diagnosis. I recall discussing something like this a
> couple weeks back. I thought this was fixed with a patch to ensure the
> pages were writable. Cc'ing Thomas G. to confirm.
> I didn't see a
> kernel version in your report, what are you running?
2.6.30-rc1~rc8.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-11 6:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-11 3:08 Bug: fio traps into kernel without exiting because futex has a deadloop Zhang, Yanmin
2009-06-11 5:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-11 6:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-11 6:21 ` Darren Hart
2009-06-11 8:33 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-06-11 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-11 11:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-12 0:59 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-06-12 8:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-12 8:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-15 6:03 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-06-15 7:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-16 3:16 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-06-15 8:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-15 8:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-11 5:58 ` Darren Hart
2009-06-11 6:05 ` Zhang, Yanmin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1244700331.2560.271.camel@ymzhang \
--to=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox