public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: Bug: fio traps into kernel without exiting because futex has a deadloop
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:18:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1244701128.6691.5.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1244699756.6691.4.camel@laptop>

On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 07:55 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 11:08 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> > I investigate a fio hang issue. When I run fio multi-process
> > testing on many disks, fio traps into kernel and doesn't exit
> > (mostly hit once after runing sub test cases for hundreds of times).
> > 
> > Oprofile data shows kernel consumes time with some futex functions.
> > Command kill couldn't kill the process and machine reboot also hangs.
> > 
> > Eventually, I locate the root cause as a bug of futex. Kernel enters
> > a deadloop between 'retry' and 'goto retry' in function futex_wake_op.
> > By unknown reason (might be an issue of fio or glibc), parameter uaddr2
> > points to an area which is READONLY. So futex_atomic_op_inuser returns
> > -EFAULT when trying to changing the data at uaddr2, but later get_user
> > still succeeds becasue the area is READONLY. Then go back to retry.
> > 
> > I create a simple test case to trigger it, which just shmat an READONLY
> > area for address uaddr2.
> > 
> > It could be used as a DOS attack.

/me has morning juice and notices he sent the wrong commit...

commit 64d1304a64477629cb16b75491a77bafe6f86963
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date:   Mon May 18 21:20:10 2009 +0200

    futex: setup writeable mapping for futex ops which modify user space data

    The futex code installs a read only mapping via get_user_pages_fast()
    even if the futex op function has to modify user space data. The
    eventual fault was fixed up by futex_handle_fault() which walked the
    VMA with mmap_sem held.

    After the cleanup patches which removed the mmap_sem dependency of the
    futex code commit 4dc5b7a36a49eff97050894cf1b3a9a02523717 (futex:
    clean up fault logic) removed the private VMA walk logic from the
    futex code. This change results in a stale RO mapping which is not
    fixed up.

    Instead of reintroducing the previous fault logic we set up the
    mapping in get_user_pages_fast() read/write for all operations which
    modify user space data. Also handle private futexes in the same way
    and make the current unconditional access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE) depend on
    the futex op.

    Reported-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
    Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
    CC: stable@kernel.org




  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-11  6:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-11  3:08 Bug: fio traps into kernel without exiting because futex has a deadloop Zhang, Yanmin
2009-06-11  5:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-11  6:18   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-06-11  6:21     ` Darren Hart
2009-06-11  8:33     ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-06-11  9:36       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-11 11:36       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-12  0:59         ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-06-12  8:12           ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-12  8:39             ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-15  6:03               ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-06-15  7:57                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-16  3:16                   ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-06-15  8:27                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-06-15  8:27                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-11  5:58 ` Darren Hart
2009-06-11  6:05   ` Zhang, Yanmin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1244701128.6691.5.camel@laptop \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox