public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 10
@ 2009-06-11 15:05 Udo van den Heuvel
  2009-06-11 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Udo van den Heuvel @ 2009-06-11 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-rt

Hello,

I found a few of these in my 2.6.29.4-rt16 logs:

NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 10

Are they rt-related?
(I saw them in older kernels without -rt as well)
How serious? How to fix?

Kind regards,
Udo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 10
  2009-06-11 15:05 NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 10 Udo van den Heuvel
@ 2009-06-11 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2009-06-11 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Udo van den Heuvel; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-rt, Thomas Gleixner

On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 17:05 +0200, Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I found a few of these in my 2.6.29.4-rt16 logs:
> 
> NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 10
> 
> Are they rt-related?
> (I saw them in older kernels without -rt as well)
> How serious? How to fix?

Not really serious, but curious, that appears to be BLOCK_SOFTIRQ, and
the only one I suspected to trigger this would be HRTIMER_SOFTIRQ.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-11 15:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-06-11 15:05 NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 10 Udo van den Heuvel
2009-06-11 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox