From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763471AbZFKPMI (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:12:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753104AbZFKPL5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:11:57 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:45261 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755571AbZFKPL4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:11:56 -0400 Subject: Re: NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 10 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Udo van den Heuvel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner In-Reply-To: <4A311D2A.808@xs4all.nl> References: <4A311D2A.808@xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:12:00 +0200 Message-Id: <1244733120.6691.433.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 17:05 +0200, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: > Hello, > > I found a few of these in my 2.6.29.4-rt16 logs: > > NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 10 > > Are they rt-related? > (I saw them in older kernels without -rt as well) > How serious? How to fix? Not really serious, but curious, that appears to be BLOCK_SOFTIRQ, and the only one I suspected to trigger this would be HRTIMER_SOFTIRQ.