From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, cl@linux-foundation.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com,
mingo@elte.hu, yinghai@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v2] Early SLAB fixes for 2.6.31
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:32:47 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1245101567.12400.38.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090615112827.GC6012@wotan.suse.de>
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 13:28 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> If a couple of specialised early boot code places have
> to test slab_is_available() to prevent crap leaking into
> our main allocators, then that's quite fine by me.
slab_is_available() will not fix the problem in that case. In fact,
existing tests of slab_is_available() have been broken because they
assumed that when it was true, then GFP_KERNEL would work.
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-15 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-12 13:25 [GIT PULL] Early SLAB fixes for 2.6.31 Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-12 13:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 13:45 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 14:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-12 16:16 ` [GIT PULL v2] " Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-12 17:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-12 21:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-15 6:46 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 9:10 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 9:38 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 14:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-14 7:12 ` Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-15 14:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-15 14:58 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 15:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-15 15:11 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 15:27 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 15:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-15 15:57 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 16:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-15 17:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-15 18:19 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 15:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-15 8:18 ` Heiko Carstens
2009-06-15 8:26 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 8:32 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 8:52 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 9:08 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 10:20 ` Heiko Carstens
2009-06-15 10:21 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 10:31 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 10:36 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 9:10 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 9:41 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 9:48 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 9:59 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 9:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-15 9:57 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-15 10:27 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 10:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-15 11:23 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 12:38 ` Hugh Dickins
2009-06-15 13:07 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-16 4:57 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-16 5:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-16 5:36 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-16 15:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-16 15:59 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 21:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-16 4:46 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-16 5:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-16 5:29 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-16 18:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-17 7:47 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-17 16:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-17 16:17 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-17 21:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-15 10:12 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 10:39 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-15 11:22 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 11:28 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 11:38 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 21:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-16 4:42 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-15 21:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2009-06-16 15:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-16 19:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-16 19:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-16 19:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-16 19:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-17 5:18 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-17 16:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-18 2:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-18 3:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-18 6:01 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-18 8:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-16 21:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-16 22:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-16 22:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1245101567.12400.38.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox