From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scheduler: introduce SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK scheduling policy flag, fourth try
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:05:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1245143108.6038.10.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090615152714.GA29092@tango.0pointer.de>
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 17:27 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> (this is the fourth version of the patch, only change is that I added
> the missing Signed-off-by line, as Ingo requested)
>
> This patch introduces a new flag SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK which can be passed
> to the kernel via sched_setscheduler(), ORed in the policy parameter. If
> set this will make sure that when the process forks a) the scheduling
> priority is reset to DEFAULT_PRIO if it was higher and b) the scheduling
> policy is reset to SCHED_NORMAL if it was either SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR.
>
> Why have this?
>
> Currently, if a process is real-time scheduled this will 'leak' to all
> its child processes. For security reasons it is often (always?) a good
> idea to make sure that if a process acquires RT scheduling this is
> confined to this process and only this process. More specifically this
> makes the per-process resource limit RLIMIT_RTTIME useful for security
> purposes, because it makes it impossible to use a fork bomb to
> circumvent the per-process RLIMIT_RTTIME accounting.
>
> This feature is also useful for tools like 'renice' which can then
> change the nice level of a process without having this spill to all its
> child processes.
That didn't work for me, reniced tasks with the flag set retained their
-nice status. See patchlet and comments below.
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 8ec9d13..1db3e4a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -2613,12 +2613,26 @@ void sched_fork(struct task_struct *p, int clone_flags)
> set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
>
> /*
> - * Make sure we do not leak PI boosting priority to the child:
> + * Revert to default priority/policy on fork if requested. Make sure we
> + * do not leak PI boosting priority to the child.
> */
> - p->prio = current->normal_prio;
Nit: that comment/assignment was placed there to make sure that readers
knew that this specific line was critical to PI. Now, it's mixed in
with something unrelated.
> + if (current->sched_reset_on_fork &&
> + (p->policy == SCHED_FIFO || p->policy == SCHED_RR))
> + p->policy = SCHED_NORMAL;
> +
> + if (current->sched_reset_on_fork &&
> + (current->normal_prio < DEFAULT_PRIO))
> + p->prio = DEFAULT_PRIO;
> + else
> + p->prio = current->normal_prio;
> +
I think it's cleaner to keep reset_on_fork functionality separate.
Thoughts on the below?
Make SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK to DTRT for reniced tasks, and make the sched_fork()
SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK bits a self-contained unlikely code block.
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
kernel/sched.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 80636ed..cb6bbc6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2613,28 +2613,35 @@ void sched_fork(struct task_struct *p, int clone_flags)
set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
/*
- * Revert to default priority/policy on fork if requested. Make sure we
- * do not leak PI boosting priority to the child.
+ * Make sure we do not leak PI boosting priority to the child.
*/
- if (current->sched_reset_on_fork &&
- (p->policy == SCHED_FIFO || p->policy == SCHED_RR))
- p->policy = SCHED_NORMAL;
+ p->prio = current->normal_prio;
- if (current->sched_reset_on_fork &&
- (current->normal_prio < DEFAULT_PRIO))
- p->prio = DEFAULT_PRIO;
- else
- p->prio = current->normal_prio;
+ /*
+ * Revert to default priority/policy on fork if requested.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(p->sched_reset_on_fork)) {
+ if (p->policy == SCHED_FIFO || p->policy == SCHED_RR)
+ p->policy = SCHED_NORMAL;
+
+ if (p->normal_prio < DEFAULT_PRIO)
+ p->prio = DEFAULT_PRIO;
+
+ if (PRIO_TO_NICE(p->static_prio) < 0) {
+ p->static_prio = NICE_TO_PRIO(0);
+ set_load_weight(p);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * We don't need the reset flag anymore after the fork. It has
+ * fulfilled its duty:
+ */
+ p->sched_reset_on_fork = 0;
+ }
if (!rt_prio(p->prio))
p->sched_class = &fair_sched_class;
- /*
- * We don't need the reset flag anymore after the fork. It has
- * fulfilled its duty:
- */
- p->sched_reset_on_fork = 0;
-
#if defined(CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS) || defined(CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT)
if (likely(sched_info_on()))
memset(&p->sched_info, 0, sizeof(p->sched_info));
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-16 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-15 15:27 [PATCH] scheduler: introduce SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK scheduling policy flag, fourth try Lennart Poettering
2009-06-15 15:37 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Introduce SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK scheduling policy flag tip-bot for Lennart Poettering
2009-06-16 9:05 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2009-06-16 16:47 ` [PATCH] scheduler: introduce SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK scheduling policy flag, fourth try Lennart Poettering
2009-06-17 8:46 ` [patch 1/2] " Mike Galbraith
2009-06-17 8:48 ` [patch 2/2] " Mike Galbraith
2009-06-17 16:36 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Add SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK functionality for nice < 0 tasks tip-bot for Mike Galbraith
2009-06-17 16:36 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Clean up SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK tip-bot for Mike Galbraith
2009-06-17 10:32 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Introduce SCHED_RESET_ON_FORK scheduling policy flag, fix tip-bot for Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1245143108.6038.10.camel@marge.simson.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=lennart@poettering.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox